-
Originally Posted by
Riczaj01 
but they are already fairly young, and already have 14 picks. This is a young strong team, not a ton of holes. Like I said they are going to package these picks and I bet move into the 1st w/a 2nd pick.
I doubt they end up w/more then 4-5 picks
Yeah packaging them and moving up is more likely and makes sense for them. Keeping Smith only pays off if something happens to Kaep, but other then that, its a waste of opportunity.
I'm trying//to let go//of maybe//but maybe's just so//very interesting//Oh, what a thing.
-
-
True, and it might well have been the reason Smith was such a trooper. They probably said, hey keep your mouth shut this year and we'll get you to a team that needs a starter; and if something bad happens to kap in the meantime you could well earn it back here.
-
Originally Posted by
Riczaj01 but they are already fairly young, and already have 14 picks. This is a young strong team, not a ton of holes. Like I said they are going to package these picks and I bet move into the 1st w/a 2nd pick.
I doubt they end up w/more then 4-5 picks
You still have a very expensive backup QB. There are always areas to fix. I wish the Bears had the issue of too many picks
-
Me to, but the Bears and 9rs are in two completely different places, 49'rs are looking more like the 05 Bears and the Bears are on the verge of being outdated.
-
Heard if this KC deal goes through for Smith that the 49ers will be going into the draft with 15 picks (compared to just 5 for chicago)!
None of my posts on this forum have been aided by the use of deer-antler spray...
-
if the latest mock is correct and flucker and all the other 1st round quality OL are gone; drop back Chicago DROP BACK! get another 2-3 picks and just go BPA at 31.
-
High Fives / Like - 1 High Fives, 0 Dislikes
-
SF is GOING to be trading up. I really believe if there's ANY favorable variation of the trade I submitted here (again, wasn't my idea, I just expanded on it), we HAVE to trade back, especially if the elite o-linemen are gone, like ric said. I think the 49ers would be okay with moving up in the first and second while sacrificing both 3rds; they can definitely afford it.
-
Originally Posted by
Henry Burris SF is GOING to be trading up. I really believe if there's ANY favorable variation of the trade I submitted here (again, wasn't my idea, I just expanded on it), we HAVE to trade back, especially if the elite o-linemen are gone, like ric said. I think the 49ers would be okay with moving up in the first and second while sacrificing both 3rds; they can definitely afford it.
However if they trade for Revis that changes things right there.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Henry Burris High-fived for this post.
Reply With Quote
