21 reps for Clowney...

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by butkus3595, Feb 23, 2014.

  1. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,263ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    correction...he'll run a 4.47!
     
  2. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,263ß
    Oh yeah...and his 10 was a 1.56.
     
  3. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,263ß
    4.48 and a 1.59 10 on his second attempt.
     
  4. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,650
    Likes Received:
    2,455
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,258ß
    Rep numbers are overrated.

    His 40 time was more than enough to make him a top pick
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,263ß
    Aarron Donald ran a 4.65 at 285 pounds...played out of his mind at the senior bowl too.
     
  6. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,609
    Likes Received:
    3,977
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,884ß
    oh ya and he was doing this 11 years ago so comparing what people did at the combine 11 years ago is laughable.
     
  7. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff Yes, in the woods.
    Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,921
    Likes Received:
    1,166
    ßearz ßuckz:
    810ß
    Gotta respect that comparatively disappointing statistics that Peppers put up lead to us still talking about him 11 years later. Most first rounders don't play that long, or that well. ......And the comparison is also of note because one player would be replacing the other.

    It just shows you how little the modern day slave auction has to do with football production.
     
  8. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,099
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,263ß
    Who ran a 1.56 10, 10 years ago? And why is it laughable? I'm assuming you're still talking about bench numbers. Has there been some sort of advance in bench press technique over the last 10 years that allows people to rep 225 more then in the past?
     
  9. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,609
    Likes Received:
    3,977
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,884ß
    I don't know what the #'s from 11 years ago look like, but I bet the vast majority were worse then they are today and over the last few years. That's how the combine tends to go; as time goes by and the players gear more and more of their time and training specifically towards the combine they are going to be better at it then the guys that came before hand.
     
  10. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,650
    Likes Received:
    2,455
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,258ß
    For comparison sake Ric, Sapp (might be best 3-tech in NFL history) only did 16 reps
     

Share This Page