31 percent of all players on all NFL rosters last year were undrafted players.

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, May 17, 2014.

  1. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I don't do the sig bet stuff. You know that and I never said you were being racist I said you were stereotyping by position and to me you are. Tim Tebow would probably still be playing if he's agreed to play RB or HBack. I'm not saying it's a common thing for guys like him and Lynch to convert but it's also not the impossibility you want to make it.

    You like Ford. I like Ford too but with the exception of a few nice carries and a little shake and bake move last preseason that left a tackler looking foolish I haven't seen all that much from him. He wasn't all that and a bag of chips on STeams either so it's not like we're talking about a core player here. Guys like him get replaced all the time.

    How do you rank functional speed? As far as quickness and agility it would seem that Lynch is at least the equivalent of Carey and so far the coaches have said he's been impressive. I think we both know that Carey is a virtual lock to be the #2 back so all we're talking about is the #3 spot. Ford has some traits the Bears may value and Lynch has a few other they may also value. What it all comes down to is who they can use the most now with a few points thrown in for upside.
     
    #41
  2. BearDownUnder

    BearDownUnder Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +80 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    52ß
    But if Ford was so amazing why did they draft Carey in the 4th round?

    The way I see it Ford does have a huge gap on Lynch for the number 3 spot, and he should aim to push for the number 2 spot and to be a guy who sees snaps. But Lynch has some traits that make me think he's worth a shot. He reminds me of the patriots model of working out first and fore most if a guy is a football player and then working out where to put him. I think he'll be the 4th best RB and if he makes the roster it will be for what he can do all around. Same with Ford. Sure they will be competing directly for the spot on the RB depth chart but it's an all round game.

    I would say the reason 31% of all players on rosters were undrafted last year is because of special teams. The last few roster spots always go down to special teams and it's often where the undrafted guys who might not have the perfect measurables or otherwise stand out due to competitiveness and how well they respond to coaching. It's also where Ford and Lynch will have to contribute to make the roster.
     
    #42
  3. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,553
    Likes Received:
    3,441
    Ratings:
    +4,098 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,504ß
    My personal favorite Bears UDFA was Jay Hilgenberg. Most of you guys know I'm an oline nut, and I still enjoy watching old video of this guy play. He was an UDFA who had a stellar 13 year career & was a Pro Bowl Bear 7 times, and an All-Pro 7 times. He's been nominated for the Hall of Fame but centers have a tough time getting into the Hall. I loved watching him block for Walter Payton.

    Anyway, here's a fun link of the top 25 UDFA's from the last 25 years. If you Google the topic you'll be amazed at some of the guys who were UDFA's (many are not on this particular list). Some are among the best players ever to play in the NFL. Before someone jumps on me and says this is the exception and not the rule, hey, I concede that. My only point is that some of the best players to ever play the game have been UDFA's (15 are in the Hall of Fame). Yes it is the exception. But quality guys do go undrafted that end up having stellar careers. And we've already read that 40% of 1st round players end up busts (from that 10 year study posted earlier today). So the fancy pedigree doesn't assure a solid player. I guess I just get frustrated when I read posters denigrate UDFA's as if they have no shot at having an NFL career. Some will not only have long NFL careers but will also be Pro Bowl level players. History bears that out (pun intended) :smile:

     
    #43
  4. short faced bear

    short faced bear Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,961
    Likes Received:
    1,404
    Ratings:
    +1,558 / 0 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    It would seem to me that Emery is cycling through/kicking tires on more players than JA did. I don't expect UDFA miracles but just to get a backup TE and a reserve safety would be great. Anything else is gravy as far as addressing needs.

    I'm hoping the expanded scouting dept. can really help getting good UDFA's.
     
    #44
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    Ratings:
    +1,756 / 2 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    823ß
    Yeah, I liked Ford last PS too. And Id love for him to become a valuable guy for us. But, and this is admittedly very preliminary here, I haven't seen this great "athleticism" translated to the field yet. I don't recall him standing out at all on STs, correct me if I'm wrong here. And all last year when our #2 RB was utterly ineffective and overpaid I don't recall Ford ever getting a single snap on offense. Pretty much the equivalent of CornWash not getting hardly any PT despite a DL that was a complete dumpster fire.

    So yeah I think the idea that Ford should be just handed a roster spot because "his athletic numbers are better" is pretty weak. As Soul said, guys like him get replaced all the time. If Ford was all that he'd have been given a few handoffs last year and he wasn't.
     
    #45
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,883
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Ratings:
    +3,209 / 12 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,170ß
    If we are going to have a Bears combine, then yeah Ford should be entered. If we are looking for who is going to gain more yards with the ball, then we should probably wait and see what they do in the camps and preseason before we crown anyone. We have some good competition here. I can't even count the number of players that had great combine numbers and did badly on the field. Not to say that is Ford, but I'm far from thinking that he is going to be the best RB just because of his measurables. There is a reason that he did not play all that much last year and that we brought in more than one RB to take a look at.
     
    #46
  7. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,553
    Likes Received:
    3,441
    Ratings:
    +4,098 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,504ß
    I really agree 100% with this. This upgraded scouting department, and a solid GM in Emery should result in some good talent being harvested from the UDFA pool each year. Even if it's just a few players to fill out our roster and add much needed quality depth. It doesn't have to be a great player find, but just finding rock-solid depth here-and-there would make us a better team. I think it's things like this that separate the best teams from the good teams. We've often been a good team, but just couldn't climb into that great team position. I'm hopeful that Emery and the upgraded scouting department can change this, and a few UDFA's could be key in this process......even if their merely depth players.
     
    #47
  8. Chicago_66

    Chicago_66 Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2013
    Messages:
    702
    Likes Received:
    400
    Ratings:
    +455 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    167ß
    I read a piece similar to that the other day. I understand Kurt Warner had a great career (he was #1 on the list I read as well) but I don't see how you can rank him above Hall of Famers like John Randle, Larry Little, Willie Brown, Joe Perry, Warren Moon, and Night Train Lane. Warner isn't even a lock to be a Hall of Famer. He very well could end up there but these guys are in the Hall of Fame. The list should start with them and then we can talk about the Wes Welkers and and Jeff Saturdays of the world.
     
    #48
  9. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,553
    Likes Received:
    3,441
    Ratings:
    +4,098 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,504ß
    BIH, the season is on the brink of disaster until we bring back the mighty Harvey Unga for his 17th Bears stint :smile:
     
    #49
  10. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,270
    Likes Received:
    3,412
    Ratings:
    +4,146 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,509ß
    you think they'll carry 10 RB's, cool I'll take that bet! You're on.

    listen I don't think he's going to be the backup, but I don't think you can dismiss what Trestman and Kromer are saying about him, about his ability to see and react to the field, those are key components to the KR/PR as well as RB positions.

    I also don't think you can honestly say the team has ANY confidence in Ford right now after they brought in 2 competitors for the backup and 3rd rb role. If the team liked Ford so much they wouldn't have brought in Carey to fight for the #2 spot, or Lynch to fight for the 3rd/ST role.
     
    #50
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.