I know many believe Donald is the only choice that will make them happy, and it may happen. I am hopeful that the combination of players make us better which I tried to make the point previously by saying. I am not against Donald but have my concerns, the point is are you better off with Donald and whoever, vs (Pryor, Dix,Dennard, or Mosley ) in rd 1 and taking DT later. Having Dennard in place for next yr when Peanut is gone and let him play nickel this year. Maybe FS even, or maybe he beats out Peanut and starts. If Peanut gets injured Dennard would look pretty good. Same story for Mosley with DJ, Bostic and McC. Safety vs DT been well documented. Jimmy Ward may not be on the board to bank on for rd 2. Is getting Donald worth the lower value you will receive at rd 2 for another position when so many DT's on board that can prob, start. (EGO Ferguson, Kelcy Quarles, Anthony Johnson, Will Sutton, Daquan Jones, etc.) Most if not all will be on the board in rd 2 and several in rd 3. I am not against Donald in RD 1 and if the plan is 2 DT's as I have read in various places then Donald makes more sense. The drop in talent is just so much larger at some of the other positions of need we have (ILB, S, DE) I would love to see Donald and Quarles, it would definetely fix the DT position for years to come and with Peae a FA next yr and Ratliff on 2 yr deal it could happen. Just not sure I want Conte and Mundy starting in the S positions. Maybe Ed Reynolds FS from Sanford is still avail. in Rd 3 . Very exciting and interesting options, thats my only point.