Are the Chicago Bears Prepping to Go Young Full Throttle?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Feb 17, 2014.

  1. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Coordinator SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,068
    Likes Received:
    2,087
    Ratings:
    +2,376 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    779ß
    This is a short article, but it makes a couple of good points. This was interesting: "The thing to remember about the free agency periods is that they are not about finding superstars. Signing players is about depth, getting talent to fill roster spots at a reasonable price. It will be the draft where Emery makes his money finding the stars. "

  2. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    21,623
    Likes Received:
    2,528
    Ratings:
    +2,981 / 8 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    993ß
    been saying this since last off season, ya it's a full on rebuild.
  3. dabears

    dabears Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    But Ric, I thought it was called a retool in disguise. :rofl2::rofl2:
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Coordinator SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,068
    Likes Received:
    2,087
    Ratings:
    +2,376 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    779ß
    LOL, and Angelo & Lovie were not really let go. We just "retooled" them.

    :-)
    • Like Like x 1
  5. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    497
    Ratings:
    +575 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    281ß
    The bills are expected to let Alex Carrington walk...I wouldn't mind seeing him in a bears uni. He can play end or tackle....very versatile.
    • Like Like x 1
  6. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    497
    Ratings:
    +575 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    281ß
    Earl Mitchell is another young guy who could play d tackle for us and could come cheaply on the free agent market.
  7. little bear

    little bear Assistant Head Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    12,082
    Likes Received:
    731
    Ratings:
    +831 / 1 / -2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    742ß
    Well, this is good news. Back in 2010 I actually wanted the Bears to draft that kid. Great size, strong and very versatile.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Jimmors

    Jimmors The Rhymenoceros Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    29,853
    Likes Received:
    4,136
    Ratings:
    +4,456 / 8 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    758ß
    And, going to disagree again. Its not a rebuild, we still have an intact core of vets (especially offense). How many rebuild teams have a Pro-bowl capable QB, WR duo AND RB?

    We are definitely shifting to a younger team, but its not the dreaded R word.
  9. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    21,623
    Likes Received:
    2,528
    Ratings:
    +2,981 / 8 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    993ß
    we aren't rebuilding the entire team, just the D. And yes when you have 6 guys left on 1 side of the ball...it's a rebuild.
  10. rich1978

    rich1978 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    156
    Ratings:
    +182 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    95ß
    unfortunately it definitely looks like a defensive rebuild. Offense looks fine, only minor tweaks but D.... gah!

    With so many contracts expiring and Cutler's bloated figure, I hope Emery has his wheeler-dealer hat on, he's going to be very busy!
  11. mdbearz

    mdbearz Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    613
    Likes Received:
    262
    Ratings:
    +283 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    24ß
    I'm surprised Peppers isn't cut yet
  12. jbunch14

    jbunch14 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2013
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    132
    Ratings:
    +161 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    62ß
    I am as well, to give him a leg up on FA, which is opening in just a couple of weeks. I believe since he is vested, he can sign at any point after he is released. The only option at this point is a total overhaul of the D, as youth is what we really need right now. The two players left that I really want re-signed is Wootton and Bowman. Ratliff would be good as well, but his age is a concern.
  13. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    497
    Ratings:
    +575 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    281ß
    Cutlers number is not bloated...it's only bloated if they don't take advantage of the clause that allows them to turn it into bonus money.
  14. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Coordinator SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,068
    Likes Received:
    2,087
    Ratings:
    +2,376 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    779ß
    I agree, but if we CAN absorb the cap hit without having to prorate the bonus over future years, it will allow the team to be in healthier cap-shape in future years. I'm not advocating we do this (pull the trigger on the bonus thing) or don't do it, but I actually like how the Bears set this up with Cutler. It seems like a win/win thing. Now that obviously depends upon whether or not we agree on Cutler's worth, and on how well he performs moving forward with the Bears.
    • Like Like x 1
  15. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    497
    Ratings:
    +575 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    281ß
    Yes, and they also did it with Jennings and Slausens deals as well...so if we don't want to touch Cutlers money this year we don't have too...all depends on who we're targeting and whats needed. It was an unbelievably smart way to go about the signings.
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff Yes, in the woods. Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,607
    Likes Received:
    969
    Ratings:
    +1,135 / 3 / -2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    484ß
    Cutting him before June 1 means that we can't spread his cap hit over two years. That is a much needed $4+M.
    • Like Like x 2
  17. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    21,623
    Likes Received:
    2,528
    Ratings:
    +2,981 / 8 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    993ß
    I'm a wait to see it to believe it on this. IF it was that easy then why not just structure it that way from the get go? IF it used that way, I'll be more happy w/it, but I don't see it happening.
  18. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Coordinator SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,068
    Likes Received:
    2,087
    Ratings:
    +2,376 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    779ß
    I don't understand the cap nuances at all. But in my own pea brain, I have it figured that teams do have some ability to count contract money in different ways against the cap, and the Cutler contract is just one of ours that will allow Emery to adjust the cap hit to best fit our situation moving forward. We can take a greater hit early-on in the contract, and lesson the size of the hit in future seasons, or we can lessen the front size of the hit, but then have a greater cap hit in future seasons. If this is true then I'd rather we take our lumps this season and have greater cap space later. And with Peppers, I'd just cut the guy and pay the cap penalty now. Yes it hurts now, but why mortgage our future? I do understand that Cutler and Pep are two completely different cap situations. Now you guys who understand this better than I do, may have to enlighten me here .....I've never really understood the voodoo of the cap.
  19. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    497
    Ratings:
    +575 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    281ß
    You can cut him before then and designate him a june 1st cut I believe and it will have the same effect.
  20. 4dabers

    4dabers Veteran DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    681
    Likes Received:
    601
    Ratings:
    +736 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    81ß
    Bearstuff and Butkus I think are both right. The whole June 1st designation allows the Bears to spread the dead money over two seasons and not just this one. However, I think Butkus is right in that teams can cut players earlier and designate them June 1st cuts (for the benefit of the player), but I THINK this is limited to just two players a team (I could be off on the limit number), which really doesn't effect us, but it IS allowed (early June 1 cuts). With that said, perhaps there is a caveat in the rule that states that you still have to at least wait until FA starts (the new league year), which would make sense.
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page