Arkush: Free agency success leaves Bears well positioned for draft

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by ZifanQ, Mar 29, 2014.

  1. ZifanQ

    ZifanQ Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,522
    Likes Received:
    146
    Ratings:
    +168 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    82ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I thought he made a pretty good point with all our DE's and DT's. But on the other hand Allen is not good against the run and Young isn't a proved player much like the rest of the DE's on our team besides Houston+Allen.
     
    #1
  2. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    Well as usual Hub's lack of an in depth knowledge of the plan leads him to his also usual false conclusions. The Bears signed Houston to play DE not DT. He was originally slotted for RDE but I think a few could see, and in those few I include Emery, that he was far better suited for LDE and although Young played a lot of LDE in Detroit he was actually more productive at RDE because of his size. But.......Young has yet to prove he's a top pass rusher who can close the deal and get you a dozen sacks a year to go with his pressures. Pressures are nice but it still leaves a QB upright to possibly complete a pass. He can't do that laying on the ground so sacks are game changers.

    So Emery upgraded RDE with one of the best pass rushers in the NFL which leaves Young free to spell both Allen and Houston. He's the least expensive of the bunch and not over paid as a swing DE which he played in Detroit when Avril was still there. Izzy was signed because he can move into the DT spot and it a fairly effective pass rusher from there and not so much from LDE. I'm not saying Houston won't be used inside but my understanding coming from both Houston himself and Brad Biggs whose a lot closer to the team than Hub can ever hope to be is that there is no plan right now to make Houston a full time 3 tech DT. In fact Houston has already said that he wants to drop 15-20lbs so he can be a more effective edge rusher. If they were gonna play him at DT I would think they'd want him to stay around 300lbs like he is.

    It's entirely possible that if the draft breaks differently than we all expect that Houston could end up there or Ratliff ended up playing 3 tech on most downs although he's really more of a NT in a 4-3. Collins can also play both and actually so can Paea but none of them have the same set of skills Melton had so logic says they'd like to replace that and I believe they will in the draft. What we don't know is where but it's likely to be in the first two rounds since after that the better 3 techs will be gone. Hub also forgets that the Bears rotate their linemen so we often keep 4 DEs and 4 DTs. The draft may dictate who stays and who goes but it's fairly certain to me that if Emery didn't feel that Izzy was an upgrade over Lane and Scott he wouldn't have asked him back. All I know is that we're going to camp with a lot of DL and Enery his gonna make damn sure he has enough frontline and quality backup talent to ride out another injury storm. We may even keep more than 8 since we aren't carrying an active position for Hester this year and we won't have Scott as an OT either.

    There's really no way of telling for sure what the plan is now that Allen is on board too, and I at least agree with Hub that's it's opened up other possibilities which make it much harder for anyone to figure out what the Bears may do and of course Emery likes it that way. A good poker player never tips his hand unless he means to and if anything Emery is a very good poker player.

    Nice post Zif. Thanks!
     
    #2
  3. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    I don't know that he's all that bad against it because he has a lot of tackles for a RDE but it's been said that he doesn't like to play the run as much as he does teeing off on the passer. We'll see what they do with him. Young would make a good swing DE since he plays both sides about equally well. With his size though I don't know that you want him playing the LDE spot on early downs as much as Houston.
     
    #3
  4. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    Ratings:
    +1,755 / 2 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    823ß
    I noticed that too, Soul. I don't know where people are getting this idea that Houston is going to magically become the teams 1st-string 3tech after being a DE his whole career. There's no credible evidence to support that and what little we have heard in fact contradicts it as you pointed out. The fact that he's known to be stout against the run and has flexed inside here and there does NOT make him our new 3T!

    Geez, haven't we learned our lesson recently with trying to shoehorn players into new positions or ones they're not best suited for? Maybe we should move Peanut to S and Alshon to CB while we are at it....
     
    #4
  5. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,883
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Ratings:
    +3,209 / 12 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,170ß
    Don't give Mel any bright ideas.
     
    #5
  6. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,550
    Likes Received:
    3,441
    Ratings:
    +4,098 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,501ß
    He makes a good point.
     
    #6
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,883
    Likes Received:
    2,183
    Ratings:
    +3,209 / 12 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,170ß
    Personally, I categorize a Tillman replacement at a future need. Possibly a critical future need. At this point, I have no reason to believe that Tillman won't get the job done next year. An argument can be made that he is old and he was oft injured lately, and those are real discussion points, but I just don't see his replacement as a glaring need at this point.

    S, yes. and even LB. We have half a busload of them but only Briggs (who might now be questionable) and DJ Williams performed at all well last year. Running backs were getting in the backfield way too often. I would say that S and LB are more critical at this point in time than CB, but that's just my opinion. At this point in time, I don;t know how good or how bad our inside rush will be either. We have good additions, but mostly are on the edge. Will they affect the play in the center? They should as they draw the attention of the OL, but not sure how much pressure we will be able to generate in the middle. I'm not comfortable without a proven, penetrating DT in the middle. Allen is a stud, but he is an aging stud. Like Peppers a few years ago, he is only going to play a few more years. If we don;t have an inside pass ruch, we waste one of those years. For me, that is still the #1 priority, but I don't know if Emery sees it the same way.

    I WOULD say that quality depth is a current critical need at CB though.
     
    #7
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    That I won't deny it but did he forget the Mundy was signed to be a starting Safety and that any successor to Tillman will sit this year if both CBs remain healthy all year? I just read another mock that has us taking Dennard when of the three top CBs he's the worst fit of the bunch for us.

    It's early and I probably need to just stop commenting on these wild ass ideas made up by people who aren't all that familiar with the team. Hub likes to think he is but he became a persona non grata around Halas Hall more than a decade ago. He has no more info or inside scoops than I have.

    I just read an article for Brad Biggs that for some reason only God and the publisher of the Trib knows won't post so all I can do is summarize what Biggs said he does get info from the coaches and the front office. Houston was signed with the thought of playing him a RDE but they were concerned about the lack of sacks he might produce and as I did felt he might do better on the left side. Young was signed to compete with him for one of those two spots but they were still concerned that while they had two guys who played the run well neither was a top pass rusher.

    Emery moved quickly once Allen left Seattle without a deal and made him a market level offer to be the starting RDE, something Seattle would not do on either score, and we got Allen who turned down a $1 mil more per year from Oakland in order to play for a contender. Now the Bears feels comfortable moving Houston to LDE and using Young as a swing DE to relieve on both sides. Allen has been playing as much as 90% plus of Minny's defensive snaps and although he's hard to get off the field the Bears would like to cut that back to around 70% with Young taking up the slack. He could also move to LDE to rush if Houston moves inside and spell him on 20% of the defensive snaps.

    That's the current plan as it's been outlined to Biggs by the Bears themselves. There is currently no intent to play Houston at 3 tech DT as an every down thing. So what we have is a whole bunch of media types running around saying the totally changes the Bears plans when all it does is open up some option again and make them less predictable which is good because otherwise what would we have to debate right? :smilebig:
     
    #8
    • Like Like x 2
  9. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,763
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    Ratings:
    +1,755 / 2 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    823ß
    Of course not cuz that would be STOOOPID. Get a clue, Hub.
     
    #9
  10. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,258
    Likes Received:
    3,408
    Ratings:
    +4,140 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,495ß
    Houston has played all along the line, and we have 2 other DE's paid like starters in Young and Allen, so while you can agree or disagree w/the idea of Houston as a DT, there is reason to think it could well be the case b/c you've paid 2 other guys in Allen and Young to start at DE. For ANYONE to think they know what Emery is planning on how the team is built is foolhearty, it's all theoretical. The team also has Ratliff and Collins to play DT, Rattliff proved last year he's a capable starter, so even if Houston isn't the day 1 starting DT, he's definately in the rotation, so that gives you 3 guys in a rotation at DT and 5 at DE, the Depth at DL is pretty thick right now.
    If you can say that a replacement for Tillman is a back burner, then you could say the same about Ratliff. And Tillman is as likely to get hurt at Ratliff and the depth at CB is FAR less. Starting S, possibly 2 is a far larger concern then DT also. And We haven't even gotten into the lack of depth at LB, where we have 3 SAM guys in Bostic/Shea/Greene, 2 possible ILB's in DJ/Bostic(if DJ stays healthy and Bostic actually takes a GINORMOUS leap forward), and no one backing up the 1 armed man at WILL.

    Per usual Soul's arrogance is also showing, for a guy that has missed so much in the past to talk shit about a guy that makes his living actually talking to people in the organization, and other beat guys that talk to people in the org is laughable. :lol-032: . I mean seriously tell me more about how Campbell was a great backup. :stfu:
     
    #10

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.