Be honest: Poll

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Henry Burris, Oct 28, 2013.

?

Would you oppose cheating?

  1. Yes

    12 vote(s)
    63.2%
  2. No

    7 vote(s)
    36.8%
  1. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,959
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    ßearz ßuckz:
    953ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Okay, essentially the question is this: If the Bears could cheat, without getting caught, or injuring other players, and won enough games to have Jay Cutler back at a critical time for the playoff race, would you be in favor of it? I'm not meaning steroids or Adderall, necessarily (I take that back, get Chris Conte on a healthy dose), but some rule bending way.
     
  2. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,959
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    ßearz ßuckz:
    953ß
    While it may sound at odds to wanting the Packers and Vikes to be amongst the best teams in the league, we're decimated, this season is likely over, and honestly, I'm tired of it.
     
  3. DaTreeBears

    DaTreeBears Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    691
    ßearz ßuckz:
    663ß
    False win over a true lose. I would become a packer fan instead if I heard they did this.
     
  4. blinddeafmute

    blinddeafmute DaBears Ditka

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    24,939
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    ßearz ßuckz:
    60ß
    If you aren't cheating, you aren't trying to win.
     
  5. shark86x

    shark86x Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,227
    Likes Received:
    916
    ßearz ßuckz:
    983ß
    Depends. Lip reading the peckers coaches on the sidelines? Do it. Breaking into their locker room to steal the playbook? No. As far as rule bending, I prefer we found some loopholes to exploit rather than do any cheating. Tman seemed good at that in canada, but I don't know what kind of loopholes they can use to get cutler back.
    All the adderal in the world wouldn't help conte. Maybe they could put a conte mask on Staley? That would be an upgrade.
     
  6. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,651
    Likes Received:
    2,455
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,259ß
    It is only cheating if you get caught
     
  7. jbunch14

    jbunch14 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2013
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    183
    ßearz ßuckz:
    213ß
    I tried to explain this to my wife. She was not amused....
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Funny Funny x 2
  8. gramster10

    gramster10 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    no
     
  9. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,651
    Likes Received:
    2,455
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,259ß
    Ok.... Question for Burris.

    Cheating how? Sticky on gloves? "Stealing" snap counts?

    Define how you envision cheating and yuk could get vastly different answers
     
  10. mdbearz

    mdbearz Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    371
    ßearz ßuckz:
    250ß
    Coming up with inventive new way to try and get a competitive advantage, yes.
    Loopholes, yes

    Doing something that if you get caught doing will result in punitive action, but will not cause harm to anything but a pocket book, maybe.

    This is such a gray area.

    In general my answer is no, don't cheat you know what it looks like.
     

Share This Page