Bears beat Vikings 31-30: Post Game Analysis

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by The Benjamin, Sep 15, 2013.

  1. Adibear

    Adibear
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    30
    ßearz ßuckz:
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I'm with you on this...should have won by at least two touchdowns..if you take away the opening kick off touchdown return and Cutlers fumble return,I think that would have made a better score..
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,715
    Likes Received:
    2,467
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,324ß
    There are those who take a win as a win and don't look for things to improve because they won

    Then there are those who take the win as a win but also see things that can be approved upon which could prevent the team from reaching the playoffs and/or Super Bowl.

    Being the second is not a doomsayer
     
  3. dachuckster

    dachuckster
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,608
    Likes Received:
    724
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,343ß
    How about the cluster-f*ck of the 1st and goal call where we went with a 3 TE heavy package and then passed. That is the one that made my blood boil.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    13,217
    Likes Received:
    4,203
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,292ß
    I've been a Bears fan for a bit over a half-century now. That doesn't mean I know anything, other than I'm an old guy. But, if I've learned 1 thing in all of those seasons, it is to "stop and smell the roses" when you're winning. Soak it all in. Believe the best in that year's team unless they prove otherwise.

    I am going to enjoy this season. I love being in first place in the NFC-N over the Packers. I love being unbeaten at 2-0.

    Those who want to wring their hands and worry over bad things that MIGHT happen to us this season......well......that's cool too. But I'm not going there. And I'm not going to give up on us winning against the Packers yet either. Let's watch the games before we roll over and give up future victories to the Pack this year.

    Gotta play the games. Believe in the team.

    Go Bears!
     
    #64 JustAnotherBearsFan99, Sep 16, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2013
    • Like Like x 4
  5. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff
    Expand Collapse
    Yes, in the woods.
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,943
    Likes Received:
    1,173
    ßearz ßuckz:
    832ß
    Word around the NFL is that he isn't being considered for roster spots after several pictures popped up implying that he is gay. Not passing judgment, just repeating what I read.
     
  6. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris
    Expand Collapse
    Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,959
    Likes Received:
    2,514
    ßearz ßuckz:
    953ß
    I read that too, but also that the Giants were looking at him. I honestly think it's because he wanted $3million while being well past 30, and not the pro bowl talent he once was.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. DavidL

    DavidL
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    4,315
    Likes Received:
    736
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,914ß
    Okay, a realist looks at what IS happening, not what MIGHT happen, and it changes week-to-week. Based on current information, it takes a Pollyanna to PREDICT Bears will beat Packers in Green Bay. The doomsayer says its hopeless. The realist says it's unlikely unless the DL and safety improve considerably in the coming weeks. One thing we agree on is that we are both very happy to be 2-0. We were very close to being 0-2.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. phatdude

    phatdude
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    82
    ßearz ßuckz:
    111ß
    I agree with:
    and
    To be 2-0 with this many changes is impressive, even if there is "luck" as a factor.

    I'm totally forgiving when it comes to offense, but I'm sticking by my guns that the D should be a little bit better than they are. I'm on the "anti-peppers" bandwagon right now. He was a superstar last year. Now he's just taking up space. I'm starting to think more and more #54 has some other effect on the D that we aren't seeing. That and a new DC could be causing this too. From what I've heard, the D has been pretty much unchanged, but if it is, then why are they just not performing the same as last year?

    Again, I think 2-0 is something we should be happy about. Also give the offense a little break. Sure some INTs and fumbles, but would you trade that in to have last years o-line back? I think the D just needs to find it's magic again.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris
    Expand Collapse
    Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,959
    Likes Received:
    2,514
    ßearz ßuckz:
    953ß
    I wouldn't necessarily say that. If the d-line doesn't improve, we just need a defense that can allow us to survive a shootout.
     
  10. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    13,217
    Likes Received:
    4,203
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,292ß
    The key as we move forward with this season, will be to see overall improvement week-to-week. Lovie had his share of faults, but I did like the way he broke the season into mini-seasons of 4 games each. If we use that model for the Trestman team, I'd hope to see us settle down and be significantly better after our first 4-game span. If we could survive the initial 4 games with new players, coaches etc, and be 3-1 or even 4-0, AND be playing significantly better ball, then that's a huge first step.

    Then at the midpoint of the season (after our 2nd 4-game span.......with 8 games under our belt) I believe we'll know exactly what we have this year, in this initial Trestman team. If we could have 5 or 6 wins at that point, we'd be on our way to a 10 or 11 game season. Many here predicted an 8-8 or even a 7-9 season this first year under Trestman, so we'd be doing well, IMHO, if we are at 5 or 6 wins halfway through our season.

    Then after the 3rd span of 4-games (after 12 total games for the season), all of the newness of everything should be a thing of the past. Even the rookies should be beginning to peak for this first season. Timing, chemistry, familiarity with the new coaches and schemes, should be pretty solid at this point after 12 games. If the team is solid this first year, then I'd expect us to have 7 or 8 wins at this point and be either 7-5 or even 8-4.

    The final mini-season push would be our last 4 games of the regular season. We play the Cowboys at home, then play away at the Browns and Eagles, then have a grand finale against the Packers at Soldier Field. We shouldn't have any trouble beating the 'Boys and Browns. I could see us winning 1 of the 2 other games to finish with 3 wins out of the 4 game final stretch. That would make us 10-6 or 11-5.

    If we make it into the playoffs at this point, we should be playing our best ball. We would be 100% settled in with Trestman & company, and the newness will be gone. I'd think we'd be a formidable team at that point.

    The only thing that can derail all of this is injuries to key players (like Cutler). That would change everything. But if we remain relatively healthy, it looks like a good year for us.
     

Share This Page