Bears Defense; Lack of Talent or Poor Coaching?..............

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by soulman, Aug 31, 2014.

  1. soulman

    soulman
    Expand Collapse
    Coordinator
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    2,658
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I probably should do this as a poll but I haven't set one up so let's just do this as an open forum debate instead.


    Here's my $.02. This isn't quantum physics guys. I think the easiest way to approach answering the question asked is by watching games, listening to comments of players and coaches and then by applying some logic and deductive reasoning. Often what isn't said is more more important than what is so don't overlook that in coming to a conclusion. Before we get into what other have said let's get into what hasn't been said by those closest to the situation.

    Last fall when the Bears were struggling so badly on defense Trestman gave Mel Tucker a vote of confidence. Then he and Phil Emery gave him another when they didn't fire him but instead went out an bought him a new DL and spent our first three draft picks on defense as well. Mel Tucker has an almost entirely new DL with 3 top 20 NFL 4-3 DEs, new Safeties, a new SLB whose a former 1st round pick and a nickel LB whose a second round pick. That's as major one year overhaul of a team as I've ever seen happen around here.

    So in the face of all this change plus to new positions coaches to help teach the defense better to the DL and LBs for some reason the defense is still struggling with many of the same issues they did last year. (eg: giving up too much yardage on the ground, allowing big plays, not getting 3rd down stops). We can all agree on that right?

    So this weekend both Marc Trestman and Phil Emery came out in the media and gave Mel Tucker another big vote of confidence and said it must be the lack of talent that causing problems................What? :4 13 4[1]:

    Oh they DIDN'T say that. They haven't said anything at all have they? No vote of confidence this time. :10 2 12[1]: Somebody get Mel a towel here OK?

    Here's a simple real world example. If you hire a guy to do a job who says he has the skills to do it and then you provide him with all of the basic tools he needs to be successful and yet he's failing at the job how much longer are you gonna blame it on the tools?

    I'm not alone. What do others have to say? Mike Ditka can be a little crazy at times but when it comes to NFL football he's not an idiot. He's a HOF player and coach and the ONLY Bears coach to have won a SB and he didn't even run that defense but he did know it got him a ring. What's Mike got to say?


    Do they have enough talent?
    Talent is one thing. But coordination of the talent and how you play as a team is another thing. I’m not saying the players aren’t there. They’re just not coordinated, and they’re not playing well together.

    (Talk about throwing Mel Tucker under a bus. He's not pulling any punches is he?)


    Do you believe that the defense will look vastly improved over last season in Week 1?
    Look, you can’t turn it on and off. And you can’t rely on your offense to carry you. It puts too much pressure on them, and then they try to do things they shouldn’t do. Idealistically, you would like to say, ‘‘Hey, they’re going to be better. It’s going to be great! Everything will be fine!’’ Well, it doesn’t work that way. As much as I want it to be that way, as much as Marc wants it to be that way, it doesn’t work that way.

    (He doesn't exactly throw Trestman under there with him but he clearly puts him in the drivers seat of the bus and invites him to run it over Tucker a couple of times)

    What did David Haugh have to say in the column of his I posted today? He says it's not Marc Trestman's vaunted offense we should be concerned with (boy that's a switch) it's Mel Tuckers still unassembled defense where the problems lie with Joe D's STeams issues as the frosting on this yet unbaked cake.

    David Haugh
    After a preseason that did little to answer most pressing questions, Bears start preparation for Bills


    Offense promises to be special but chronic problems on defense and special teams point to up-and-down season.


    Game week in Chicago begins much the same way training camp opened in Bourbonnais, with the Bears facing uncertainty at safety, linebacker and on special teams.


    That's not the kind of continuity any NFL team seeks from one season to the next. That's running in place for a month.



    So it's not just me and if I spent the rest of the afternoon doing it I'm sure I could dig up at least a half dozen more articles that would express sentiments and concerns. Basically if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, has webbed feet and likes to swim in ponds then it's probably a duck and we seemed to have a matched pair named Mel and Joe.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    25,336
    Likes Received:
    4,241
    how about potentially yes or no to both, and everything inbetween?
     
  3. JoeBear

    JoeBear
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    125
    Likes Received:
    44
    I can agree with Iron Mike on some issues. The Bear defense is not playing well together right now. There are a lot of new players that need to come together and get on the same page, hopefully they will gel as a unit as the season progresses.

    At the same time I also think the game has changed, a lot, from Ditka's days. Defenses are no longer able to be as aggressive as they have been in the past and this puts a lot more pressure on the offense to "out score the other guy". I think this is what Trestman is trying to do. The current Bear defense is playing much more like a Safety Net than a Blitzkreig. It is too bad because I have always liked an aggressive defense. Why some teams like Seattle and San Fran seem to get away with being aggressive and other teams like the Bears and Lions seem to get punished for it (don't get me started on the inequality of the officiating).

    I think as a Bear fan you might as well get used to the new look. The Tucker designed defense's job is to slow them down enough to let the offense outscore the opponent.

    Hopefully we have the ball last.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. B-ell-y-iot

    B-ell-y-iot
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2014
    Messages:
    1,033
    Likes Received:
    682
    I don't disagree with the idea that there may be a problem with Mel Tucker and Joe DeCamillis; however,

    I think the timing of this debate is poor.
    I think the creation of a dichotomy (player talent or defensive coordinator) is silly.
    I think we're all bored waiting for the Bills to come to town.

    My biggest issue with this entire discussion point is the timing. Mel Tucker is our DC and Joe DeCamillis is our Steams coach at least for the beginning of the season. As fans, we are limited in our ability to evaluate a team in the preseason. We don't see the practices. We don't sit in meetings. We aren't in the film room. All we see is the pre-season games which are largely about making roster decisions. Since the primary purpose of preseason games is roster related, coaches aren't scheming the way they will in the regular season. Instead, they are scheming to get looks at players in different situations. That is their purpose. If their purpose were to win the preseason games, I'd be a lot more willing to hop on your bummer bus. With that said, this doesn't mean the DC or STC regular season scheming will be great, it just means they don't have a strong relationship. I think this argument (whether it's the talent or the coach) is a good discussion to have, but now is not the time for it. It had its time at the end of last season and it will have its time during the regular season in the event that the team plays poorly in any phase of the game (offense, defense, or special teams). It's just a poor discussion to have right now, a poor discussion to rehash over and over again, because we all understand (even if we don't agree with) the points being made at this stage and nothing (or at least very little) can be added to this until we have a look at the regular season.

    The second issue I have with this is that it assigns blame to one individual and no one individual bears sole responsibility for the production of a team or even a unit. This isn't a dichotomy. The talent can be poor, the positional coaching can be great, and the coordination of the unit can be poor just as easily as the talent can be great the positional coaching can be poor and the coordination can be average or any other iteration of those elements. I happen to believe that the talent pool on the defensive side of the ball is below average, the coaching is average, and the coordination is average. Others can disagree, that's fine. See point #1.

    The other element of this assignment of blame is the responsibility of the head coach, the GM, and the ownership. These players aren't devoid of responsibility and they need to be figured into this calculus as well. Ultimately, if the defense, special teams, or offense performs poorly, I'm more willing to blame Phil Emery than any other element in the equation. He has ultimate say in personnel decisions (and if he doesn't than the owner does and the owner deserves the brunt of the blame). If any unit fails, I think it's Emery's responsibility to fix it through personnel decisions at the head coach level, the coordinator level, the assistant coach level, and the talent level. Personnel decisions, however, aren't necessarily best handled through firing coaches, they are best handled by identifying the root problems and addressing them correctly. Fans like to see the heads roll (CUT THE FUCKER) but the best franchises are typically those that have some level of continuity and that only occurs if the GM has the balls to stand up to the red faced fan base and say - no fuck you. If a GM is always beholden to the fan bases whims, you end up with flashy coaches and dream boy players who sell jersey's but don't win games.

    I think everyone on this board (with the exception of those fucking Bill spies) wants the Bears to succeed. We also want to stake our claim on the right side of the debate should things turn south. Most importantly, everyone on this board just wants the Bills to arrive at Soldier Field. Everyone wants to see the Monsters of the Midway stream out of the Bear's maw in an orgy of smoke, noise, and excitement, and everyone wants that foot propelled ball to sail through the Chicago sky on its way to an end zone where the kick off returner will make the opening move to the 2014 football season.
     
    • Like Like x 7
    • Bear Down! Bear Down! x 1
  5. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,963
    Likes Received:
    2,536
    Both, maybe leaning a little more towards the talent on field who whiff on tackles, let people run right by them, cannot wrap up a tackle...
     
    • Like Like x 3
  6. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    13,686
    Likes Received:
    4,370
    I haven't made my mind up either way about the coaching. I'm giving it this season before I come down one way or the other. The talent though is obviously needing some help on D, but I want to see some regular season games before making up my mind as to how bad the talent is. I keep hoping that (as some posters have said) that Briggs and Williams have just been loafing in the preseason games and they can turn it on in the regular season. This could be the case......maybe we still have "Camp Lovie" after all, but just for our ageing vets. We'll know pretty soon if it's just loafing or if they just are not good players anymore.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Bear Down! Bear Down! x 1
  7. soulman

    soulman
    Expand Collapse
    Coordinator
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    2,658
    We probably are but we are also on opposing sides of this "it's only preseason" thing.

    I really do hope I'm wrong but I don't like what I see at all and apparently I'm not alone.

    Great coaches have a way of motivating players to play above their talent level so why does the Bears defensive unit seem to be playing below theirs. I've hear the DL praise "Coach P" and the LBs praise Reggie Herring for his no nonsense old school ways. Even Briggsy who I've never heard do that before not even for Lovie. But I have not heard one defensive player come out in praise of Mel Tucker. Not even once.

    I'll tell you what I believe. I believe Pete Carroll could come to Chicago and win a SB with our offense and our defense and if Mel Tucker coaches Seattle's defense they would struggle to make the playoffs which is what I expect to happen here. I don't see Tucker's guys laying it on the line for him like Seattle did when we played them. It was preseason for them too.

    No other team save the Broncos did more to upgrade their defense and I can promise you the Broncos defense is getting ready to kick ass and take names. That team wants another shot at Seattle after that embarrassing ass kicking in February and they're playing like it. I realize Mel Tucker isn't John Fox either but then that's part of the problem isn't it?

    I hope I'm wrong and that you are all pointing at me saying I told you so a month from now and were 4-0 or at least 3-1 and our defense is playing like the ones of old because if they can do that, with the offense we have this team would be tough to beat but without a defense that much better or just as bad as last years we're going nowhere fast.

    That's my story and I'm stickin' to it.
     
    #7 soulman, Aug 31, 2014
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2014
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    25,336
    Likes Received:
    4,241

    What is this, some kind of Tucker excuse thread? This was created to berate and bash unapologetically the hiring of the DC and ST coaches, any kind of excuse will not be tolerated!!!

    btw you're 100% correct.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  9. Carthage34

    Carthage34
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    25
    Interesting thread, I think that we have to be a bit patient here. I am not a Tucker fan at all and I am still scratching my head as to why he was hired, considering his less than stellar resume (Same with DeCamillis). I suspect serious dollar savings here pushed by the Front-Office/Phillips.

    The organization has totally under-performed in the drafting and evaluation/development of talent. I think we are dealing with a 3 or 4 headed monster here. Talent/players,Coaching,Scouting, and Front-Office(GM-Sweaty Teddy-McCaskey). Getting to the playoffs takes all areas committed to putting a competitive team on the field every year(I don't mean 8-8 either that's mediocre).

    Still Tucker deserves a chance to prove that he can coach and make this defense respectable(better than average). If he can't put it together he should be jettisoned IMO, same with DeCamillis.

    The decision to keep these guys was made by Emery and Trestman and if another season goes by and if the Bears don't make the playoffs, the organization needs to find and hire the best DC and ST Coaches available(not coaches that come cheap with sub par resumes). Really we could just be seeing the reverse of Lovie here(great O lousy D)... bad coaches who come cheaply and year after year of frustrating football.

    Ultimately Emery and Trestman are responsible for the talent and the coaches on the team, they need to be held responsible if this while thing implodes. I would also get rid of the team President because he hired the GM(I think he is terrible anyway) I pray we don't have another decade of bad...sorry for the rant :)
     
    #9 Carthage34, Sep 1, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2014
  10. jbunch14

    jbunch14
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2013
    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    197
    The Bills can't get to Chicago soon enough.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page