Chicago Bears 2014 Draft

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by jackiejokeman, Jan 15, 2014.

  1. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    615
    ßearz ßuckz:
    512ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I agree C-D would be almost a slam dunk pick, along with Jerrigan. But who knows with FA how it will change. If something crazy happens such as landing Byrd in FA, then the C-D pick likely goes out the window.
     
  2. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,499
    Likes Received:
    3,925
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,770ß
    Grizz, yep that's why I'm anxious to see what the Bears do in FA.
     
  3. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    615
    ßearz ßuckz:
    512ß
    Another factor is what scheme or defense will be running, if we move to a 3-4 then Jerrigan is likely out and nix enters the talks. Mack would also be in contention if it looked we were going 3-4 to play the 5.
     
  4. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,499
    Likes Received:
    3,925
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,770ß
    Grizz, i'm not 100% that they go DT/NT in the 1st. I think it's a real toss up between CB, S, ILB and DT/DE. The depth at DT/DE seems better then the other positions so it's very possible they go w/the DL in the early mid rounds.
     
  5. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    615
    ßearz ßuckz:
    512ß
    I could see S or CB easily as well. Only issue is similar to offense of the past if we get destroyed up front it won't matter who is playing behind them were pretty much dead to rights.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,621
    Likes Received:
    1,173
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,917ß
    Just for thought, I posted it a while back on Bears failed to eminate the Broncos offensive model.

    What if we do not sign McCown. Do we go for Carr at QB as he could be last of top four left. If CuItler gets hurt we need a QB, with no QB it will not matter on Defense. Resigning McCown eliminates this but not done yet.

    The Denver model is basically score more than they do. What if Eborn TE or WR Evans or Lee sitting there. Eborn allows two tight end set, another weapon on offense and helps Forte more with 2 TE set. If we cut Earl Bennett for salary cap do we pick up another potential #1 receiver, Marshall a FA next year also. If we want to outscore the other team some top not talent could be there. There will be several defensive players of value in the later rounds to grab. DT, DE, CB, OC, S, best avail.(te or qb) whichever we do not take in rd 1.

    I am not necessarily convinced of above scenario but could see it happening. Probably because we are use to a good defense and just having a kick ass offense is foreign to many of us. For years we had a kick ass defense and always brought in fresh talent. That now goes for the Offense and makes above scenario plausible.
     
  7. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    615
    ßearz ßuckz:
    512ß
    Good point and yeah IMO I'd McCown dosent come back then qb shoots up our draft board and even a first rounder is not out of the question. Cutler has Missed games the last few years, it's a trend and we have to be ready for t to happen again.
     
  8. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,967
    Likes Received:
    202
    ßearz ßuckz:
    866ß
    Just watched the SUPERBOWL ...

    Ok who's the smart ass that moved DAA BEARRSSE DEFENSE to the Great Pacific Northwest ?

    Gotta give props to Seattles Defense ... I mean JesusfuckingChrist ! Dem boyz is good !

    BTW ... they did not blow out the 1985 BEARS margin of victory ... by one point.

    They kept saying during the game how they got there with FA, drafted,undrafted.

    Can we do that ?
     
  9. Ojibway Bob

    Ojibway Bob Veteran
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    162
    ßearz ßuckz:
    294ß
    we sure can JJ and it starts with Micheal Bennett wanting to get a SuperBowl with his Brother now.
     
  10. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,499
    Likes Received:
    3,925
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,770ß

    serioulsy JJ, no need for cursing in every post you have. it's not like you're talking and it just happens, you're typing it, therefore you can and should have enough common sense to go back and remove it. It's a FAMILY FRIENDLY SITE stop w/the F bombs for no reason.

    2ndly, no the Bears cannot build via FA, the Cutler contract ate to much of it. They were able to hit FA that hard b/c their starting qb costs less then 1 mil. Cutlers contract is 20 mil; BIG DIFFERENCE. They can do some work w/FA, and will need to bring in UDFA's and drafted players but they cannot build the way Sea did b/c of they decided to way overpay Cutler.
     

Share This Page