Chicago Bears' Charles Tillman will test free agency

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by The Benjamin, Jan 25, 2014.

  1. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,901
    Likes Received:
    1,743
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,061ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Seems silly to me. Charles Woodson was 10 times the corner Tillman was and he moved positions. It's the same with Jeter never agreeing to move to 3rd....Ripken did it, and he's a legend...why can't you? Just bothers me.
     
  2. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    964
    Likes Received:
    545
    ßearz ßuckz:
    494ß
    I thought the first move was have your agent push a 2 year 11 million dollar contract at Emery. :)

    The Bears have some big needs in the secondary. Tillman is going to go talk to Lovie in Tampa.
     
  3. phatdude

    phatdude Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    82
    ßearz ßuckz:
    110ß
    This is unfortunate. I understand business is business, but this year when the defense was in the toilet, I felt Tillman played with the most heart. I hope he stays, but if he goes I think I can get over it.
     
  4. GermansbombedPH

    GermansbombedPH Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    2,064
    Likes Received:
    74
    ßearz ßuckz:
    120ß
    Like Jennings and Cutler and Slauson?

    If they would have kept him, he'd be signed by now by the Bears. Like Jennings, he would have gotten a contract at the same time.
     
  5. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,619
    Likes Received:
    2,453
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,226ß
    They are also younger and dont need as much bargaining power to get a deal he wants
     
  6. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff Yes, in the woods.
    Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,913
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    ßearz ßuckz:
    802ß
    Not necessarily. I didn't spell it out, but Peanut's cap hit for 2013 was 8 million, all in base salary, so if they were going to do the "market value" extension, they would have done it before last season and given him a signing bonus, etc. and lowered the cap number for last year. That is why it would have happened 9 months ago. Not that it couldn't be done a month ago. There was no motivation to do it (on Tillman's part) after the season because now he gets to see how big the market could be (a good gamble now that Lovie is in Tampa), no matter what Chicago brought to the table (which, given the current cap room & 28 free agents, wouldn't have been as much as "market"). Who really knows whether he has had negotiations/talks with the front office, given those two factoids?

    You simply must understand the cap and market implications before you make assumptions about what is/was possible.
     
  7. GermansbombedPH

    GermansbombedPH Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    2,064
    Likes Received:
    74
    ßearz ßuckz:
    120ß
    yeah, they could have restructured and extended him while doing this, they could do the same with Marshall if it wasn't for his relativly low Cap Hit without the guarantees.

    Still say if he would stay it would have been done already
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  8. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,500
    Likes Received:
    3,925
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,771ß
    said last year that the team was going to purge the Lovie players, and it will continue w/Tillman. Why they cannot do it all at once, or at all(Briggs still in contract) Jennings re signs(needed at least 1 cb on the roster) but looking at it, they probably are not bringing back Melton and Peppers is probably cut, no way they bring back Wrong and Steltz so while it will take 3 years(Briggs won't be back next year) there is an almost complete overhaul on D of Lovie guys.
     
  9. GermansbombedPH

    GermansbombedPH Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    2,064
    Likes Received:
    74
    ßearz ßuckz:
    120ß
    that should have happened with Lovie too. They are too old and broken to continue. Lovie wouldn't have done it, but he should have.

    Cutting Peppers is a business move unless he plays for free here and we can have him for the Cap Hit we will have him regardless. Jennings is young and good enough to be kept, no brainer.

    Wright is just bad, Steltz could get kept. At least he is a solid and cheap depth saftey that's good on the STs. He is easily replaceable if Emery wants to move on.

    Briggs is still a solid player that will help us and he still is signed. Not sure if he'll get a new contract. He won't because of Emerys drafting (Greene, Bostic, McClellin). Those are the LBs he's taken in only 2 drafts. This year could see us grabbing another LB.

    Melton seems to have some problems away from the field and isn't as motivated as you want a player in his position. I'd say move on, keep Ratliff and draft a DT. Would only need another depth option with those 2 + Paea
     
  10. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,969
    Likes Received:
    202
    ßearz ßuckz:
    868ß
    We lost our LB corp last year with Urlacher, Roach and Hayes gone. And then the Briggs injury.

    You may have noticed the DL riding into the sunset also.

    Peanut and Jennings are all we have left at CB. Those are the facts.

    Now what do we do ? Resign Peanut or go apeshit in the draft at CB when safety is the most pressing issue in the secondary?
     

Share This Page