Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is exploring whether to add thousands of seats to Soldier Field.

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Mar 5, 2014.

  1. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    185
    Ratings:
    +242 / 2 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    704ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Each with its own bar ... each with its own bathroom , each with its own hot tub getting every feed from field level camaras on big screen TVs in stereo. What stays in Vegas stays in Vegas except for this SOLDIERS FIELD EXCLUSIVE® ...

    CHICAGO BEARS HOT AIR BALOONS©™!
     
    #11
    • Like Like x 1
  2. BearDownUnder

    BearDownUnder Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +80 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    52ß
    You should run for mayor.

    It doesn't make much sense that the team with arguably the biggest market has the smallest capacity stadium. But it also doesn't make a lot of sense to renovate a stadium only to have to do it again a few years later.
     
    #12
  3. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,444
    Likes Received:
    3,381
    Ratings:
    +4,021 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,391ß
    Didn't you guys read the McCaskey's plan here? They are going to DOUBLE the seating capacity of Soldier Field for this coming season. The seating capacity will be in place for a bit over 120,000 for the opening home game. And it won't cost the city a penny (the McCaskey's are pretty smart with their money). They will sell two tickets for every seat now. One fan (with the "A" seat) is on the shoulders of the fan with the "B" ticket. It's not too bad if you get a smoking hot gal in the "upper" seat. I'd probably just get a fat old guy who farts a lot though :-(

    But we're ready for a Super Bowl bid now in Chicago, thanks to the forward thinking of the McCaskeys. Even the Mayor likes this idea :)
     
    #13
    • Like Like x 2
  4. VJ18

    VJ18 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    77
    Ratings:
    +97 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    67ß
    the reason they made the stadium small was to inflate ticket sales, i see what they did there! hahaha
     
    #14
    • Like Like x 1
  5. BearDownUnder

    BearDownUnder Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +80 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    52ß
    Um no. If they had 20,000 more seats they'd probably still sell them all out. And make a lot more money. And generate more money for the city. Then again I'm not convinced public funds should pay for all of these upgrades, but it does make sense for them to contribute something as they will get a return especially if they got the superbowl.
     
    #15
  6. draw2anderson35

    draw2anderson35 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    83
    Ratings:
    +101 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    27ß
    Does this mean Da Bears get to play at Memorial Stadium for a year again?
     
    #16
  7. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,444
    Likes Received:
    3,381
    Ratings:
    +4,021 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,391ß
    Hopefully no repeat of the dreaded 2002 season. :-(
    I'd rather they just sold the two tickets per seat and had the fat guy sitting on my shoulders and farting, than to relive the Memorial Stadium season (not because the stadium is bad, but it was a rough season from the beginning). Although we had Henry Burris get playing time that year :)

     
    #17
  8. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    47,845
    Likes Received:
    2,197
    Ratings:
    +2,610 / 7 / -9
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,383ß
    I hate to say it.... but if they want to add more seats they might have to tear the place down and start from scratch.
     
    #18
    • Like Like x 1
  9. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    406
    Ratings:
    +505 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    255ß
    Who are you kidding? You would be the fat old guy in the upper deck that farts a lot :).
     
    #19
    • Like Like x 1
  10. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,724
    Likes Received:
    1,388
    Ratings:
    +1,729 / 2 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    784ß
    Yeah, afraid that might be correct. You could probably add a couple thousand more in certain sections up high but thats about it. There's a huge amount of space on the lakeside taken up by luxury boxes and the design is inefficient for seat maximization because it was shoe-horned into the existing column facades.

    As ugly as it is from the outside (the "spaceship"), I will say SF is a great place inside to watch a game. The smallness makes it intimate and there really are relatively few seats that are "too far away" or have obstructed field views. But it simply was shortsighted and dumb to build the NFL's smallest seating capacity stadium in its largest undivided market.
     
    #20

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.