Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement! I understand what you are saying, but I see ILB and S as not very deep and if you want to get a potential starter I think you need to take them first. There will still be decent DT's in rd 3. Sutton, Quarles, and Ferguson and 2 of the 3 will prob be there, maybe all 3. I do not have a trade down in this. If not ILB you can look at CB in 2 or go DT in 2 and CB in 3. I just see more options to match are needs by picking DT later. I am not trying to get in an argument either, just stating my opinion as I see it. I trust Emery to identify the talent and with the depth in this draft I see us capable of filling multiple needs and the deep class of DT's allows us to take one later and get extra potential starters. There is no guarantee any of the picks will pan out, there is as much likelihood of a first rd DT failing in the NFL as the much as there is for any other position, but the likelihood of a DT in rd 3 compared to other positions seems more likely to succeed based on the depth at that position this year. That is my logic and reasoning.