Conte; For Some This May Be Good News.................

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by soulman, Apr 3, 2014.

  1. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    3,781
    Likes Received:
    654
    Ratings:
    +775 / 7 / -26
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,359ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    You're probably right. Smart money is on another DL. So long as they take one safety in the first two rounds to replace Conte, I'm OK with it. I don't think it would be bad to take two safeties, though.
     
    #51
  2. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    Well let's see we signed four free agents, Steltz, Mundy, Jennings, and McCray and according to their NFL bios they all play Safety. Do you have problems with basic math or just not follow the team much?
     
    #52
  3. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    3,781
    Likes Received:
    654
    Ratings:
    +775 / 7 / -26
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,359ß
    I agree with this guy...

    http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-b...le-draft-notebook-a-look-at-safety-prospects/

    I don't want to start next season with two "fringe starters" and a couple special teams guys in our depth chart at safety. Calling Conte a "fringe starter" is generous. Not many NFL teams would start him. That is where we were last year. I want to draft at least one blue-chip safety. If some high quality DL drops into 14th, then maybe take DL in first round and safety in second round. But if they go much deeper than that without drafting a safety, then we have a problem IMO.
     
    #53
  4. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    I can see that and I hate to burst your bubble but Mundy was signed to start at SS. Just because the author of that piece, another guy just like you or me, thinks he's a fringe player doesn't make him one. He couldn't even get his position right other than to say that he's more of a SS, duh. Since that's what he was signed to play unless we draft a guy whose better at SS and it moves him to FS that's where he'll probably play.

    I'll stick with the evaluations of Emery and his pro scouting bunch who say Mundy is an upgrade over Wright. I would agree that the others are primarily backups and STeam guys but all have had some starting experience as well so that give them a bit of an edge over most rookies. Anyway that's still more than zero Safeties since even Steltz has started for us before. He's not a great coverage guy but he doesn't miss many tackles either.

    We need A, a in one, Safety somewhere in the first three rounds. I wouldn't swear that it won't be in one and I can live with that but if past history serves the likelihood isn't high. Since Pryor and Dix rate as the two best and the next group doesn't even merit taking until the second or third rounds there's a 50/50 chance both will be gone before we pick. Detoilet and St. Loo are both looking for Safety help too.

    I would love to see them get Jimmy Ward in two and I could live with either Dix or Pryor in one. Part of the problem is that most of the 2nd tier guys have some holes in their game. The reason I like Ward is that although smaller he has the least holes in his game. His foot surgery is a concern too although that may be enough to drop him to us in the 2nd. I don't disagree with the need for another Safety but the only "blue chip" ones in this draft are Dix and Pryor and in comparison to some of the past first rounders they're more light blue than dark blue.
     
    #54
  5. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    3,781
    Likes Received:
    654
    Ratings:
    +775 / 7 / -26
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,359ß
    I don't think it is much of a stretch to call Mundy a "fringe starter," since he was a backup at Pittsburgh and Giants. But we'll see how it goes. Hard to imagine he could be much worse than Wright last season. So I will tentatively call that an upgrade. 0.5

    That still leave the Conte problem. No matter what else happens, I can't call 2014 a successful draft if they don't get a replacement for Conte.
     
    #55
  6. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    In 2005 the Bears went to the Super Bowl and the highest drafted staring Safety was Mike Bown (2nd) and he missed the end of the season with an injury. The other was Chris Harris who was a 6th round pick. Of the rest the highest picked was Todd Johnson (4th) and the rest were either 7th round picks or UDFAs.

    We won games on the strength of our DL and LB play and 13 picks by our CBs, Tillman and Vasher. Even the 1985 Bears team did not boast two Safeties who were blue chip draftees. Fencik was a converted WR we signed as a FA and Duerson was a 3rd round pick. How well would they have done playing behind a different front 7?

    As long as we use that #14 pick and a kid who can start I'm down with whoever we take and I'd be thrilled if we could find another starter in two because we should. DT and Safety are our two biggest immediate needs followed CB and MLB. The first four picks should do their best to address those needs.
     
    #56
  7. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    Mundy also played behind two pair of top Safeties with Pro Bowls to their name. Think of him as this years Matt Slauson. He could be a real bargain of he could be a bust but when given the opportunity to start last year he did well. Wright was terrible last year but even he's getting some love from Lovie who must believe there's something there that can be saved.

    Conte is out of the picture for now so I'm gonna table all discussion about him until he's back. Then we'll see what happens. In the meantime I'll continue to defend him against the over emotional bunch who only sees that one last play as a reason for signing his death warrant. It's more convenient to remember that one and the pick that slipped through his hands just prior to that (he didn't blow that coverage , he just didn't hold onto the ball) than it is the pick he got in the end zone that saved a sure TD early in the game.

    He had some good plays and some bad plays just like everyone else but when your FS has to make 90 tackles someone else playing in front of him is playing a whole lot worse than he is and they aren't being hung in effigy like Conte is.
     
    #57
  8. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,760
    Likes Received:
    1,409
    Ratings:
    +1,755 / 2 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    820ß
    Again, I can't help but wonder if some of these irrational impressions are the result of Conte-hate-syndrome.

    David, the most likely and reasonable outcome is that we will draft ONE safety within the first 3 rounds (somewhere). I'd be really surprised if Mundy isn't a starter come week 1. And it wouldn't shock me if Conte is in the mix too pending his medical situation. We aren't going to draft TWO STARTING SAFETIES next month. If you think or want that, you are bound to be disappointed.

    DLs and pass rushers win games for you much more frequently than safeties do IMHO. If we had had a competent front 7 last season, I doubt people would be screaming for Conte's head like they are.
     
    #58
  9. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    2,872
    Likes Received:
    1,251
    Ratings:
    +1,712 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,025ß
    Soul is correct, you don't need great safeties to win. Football games are won up front generally speaking. Seattle kind of went the opposite way, but they have some damn good lineman as well. Look at the Giants, their safety play wasn't great when the won the Super Bowl in 08, and it was slightly better in 11. Hell even their linebacker play was suspect. What did they have though? They had ONE HELL OF A DEFENSIVE LINE!! A d line that could get after the QB and create havoc in the backfield. That's where you win games and make the players around you better. I'm drafting a defensive lineman in the first, unless a corner like Gilbert slips to 14. I'm not taking a safety in round one because I don't need to!
     
    #59
  10. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,256
    Likes Received:
    3,404
    Ratings:
    +4,136 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,493ß
    Indy had a damn good S when they won or was he a cb? either way it takes a complete team to win, great DL's can mask average S play better then vice versa, but I don't think that means you ignore any position.

    this talk reminds me a few years ago when everyone said you don't need great RB's to win a SB, last year and the year before, had great rb's on both teams. No position can be taken for granted, minus punter and even those cannot be completely ignored or you endup w/a guy like Pudless.
     
    #60

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.