Could Fuller be a Safety ????

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by BSBEARS, Apr 13, 2014.

  1. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,280
    Likes Received:
    1,091
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,534ß
    Ratings:
    +1,462 / 4 / -0
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    upload_2014-4-13_9-56-1.png
     
    #1
  2. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,280
    Likes Received:
    1,091
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,534ß
    Ratings:
    +1,462 / 4 / -0
    This could justify why the Bears may be interested in Fuller and then have Peanuts replacement on the team. Just a thought
     
    #2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,299
    Likes Received:
    590
    ßearz ßuckz:
    481ß
    Ratings:
    +681 / 3 / -0
    Ya know, this could be. From what I saw on him he has great ball skills and could maybe adjust to be the rangy FS we need. He shows good ability to come up and make tackles so I guess its a possibility. I don't like drafting players with the preconceived plan to move them to a different position, but it could possibly work here.
     
    #3
    • Like Like x 1
  4. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,278
    Likes Received:
    3,853
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,301ß
    Ratings:
    +4,610 / 4 / -1
    Could be. And maybe they just see him more as a stellar safety prospect rather than as a CB at the NFL level. It seems like the position of safety has evolved to far greater importance for modern defenses. It's critically important (I think) for the Bears to no longer have the vulnerability there. The better QB's we face know how to exploit us there, and this won't end until we seriously fix the position. Maybe the Bears see Fuller as a real stud at safety, who can seriously upgrade a position where we've failed to have a stud in a number of years. But who knows? It's all just guesswork on our part.
     
    #4
  5. a_miljan

    a_miljan Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    424
    ßearz ßuckz:
    644ß
    Ratings:
    +547 / 0 / -0
    Fuller can be anything he wants as long as we trade back to get him
     
    #5
  6. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,659
    Likes Received:
    1,638
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,816ß
    Ratings:
    +2,225 / 1 / -0
    Didn't they say that about everybody's favorite whipping boy Conte?
     
    #6
  7. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,985
    Likes Received:
    1,572
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,046ß
    Ratings:
    +1,957 / 2 / -0
    Read this from Pompei.

    Dear Phil, BAD IDEA!
     
    #7
  8. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,278
    Likes Received:
    3,853
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,301ß
    Ratings:
    +4,610 / 4 / -1
    You have a point. Sometimes the position change works, and sometimes it doesn't. I just hope the guys making these decisions make good ones. We've all seen some guys moved when they transition to the NFL from college and it's worked out well. Some have been disasters. Whether or not Fuller is that guy who shines at safety (or CB for that matter), who knows. I do know one thing. If Emery, Trestman & Tucker, gets this all sorted out, and we end up with a solid defense this year, I'm going to be a mighty happy camper.

    And I've been pretty hard on Conte and Shea, but I do hope they both work out just fine this year. I'm not hating on either guy. I just want them to play well for the Bears this year.
     
    #8
    • Like Like x 1
  9. lklrlolnlilklsox

    lklrlolnlilklsox Position Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    6,743
    Likes Received:
    347
    ßearz ßuckz:
    213ß
    Ratings:
    +407 / 1 / -0
    If I'm converting a CB to S, it's Jean-Baptiste or McGill.
     
    #9
    • Like Like x 1
  10. soulman

    soulman Hall of Famer
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,273
    Likes Received:
    1,623
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,047ß
    Ratings:
    +2,074 / 7 / -3
    Kind of thought the same myself. As physical as Fuller may have been in college being physical at Safety and being physical at CB are two different things. I believe Fuller needs to add some size or some muscle just to play CB in the way that Peanut does so the leap to Safety may be even greater.

    We've tried this CB to Safety thing twice already. It put one guy out of the NFL for good and the other is struggling to adapt and out for 4-5 months with a shoulder surgery he didn't get from just rolling off his couch onto the floor. I can't see the sense to taking a top pick and taking the kind of risk involved that Pompei suggests.

    If there's a CB out there who is shy on the speed or skills to play CB who might convert nicely to Safety let's not spend a first round pick on him when there are guys in later rounds to try that experiment with. Especially since there are already decent Safety prospects woven throughout the first three rounds.
     
    #10
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.