Cutler's targets

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by The Benjamin, Sep 12, 2013.

  1. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    47,047
    Likes Received:
    1,875
    Ratings:
    +2,146 / 7 / -9
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,527ß
    From Sunday's game

    Brandon Marshall: (10)
    Alshon Jeffery: (8)
    Matt Forte: (6)
    Martellus Bennett: (6)
    Michael Bush: (1)
    Earl Bennett: (1)

    Good things happen when you spread the ball around
    • Like Like x 2
  2. GermansbombedPH

    GermansbombedPH Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,980
    Likes Received:
    50
    Ratings:
    +53 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    34ß
    that's the way it should be and will be all season long
  3. Nakoma1

    Nakoma1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    183
    Ratings:
    +183 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:


    NIIIIICE SPREAD ! ! !

    ESPECIALLY when you have the time and MORE Targets to throw it to,.... TARGETS that will actually catch the ball and run the right routes even
    ;)

    Gaaaaaawd what a concept ,.... a working offensive scheme with players and developmental coaches to boot

    ARE WE ALL DREAMING ???
  4. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    22,515
    Likes Received:
    2,951
    Ratings:
    +3,573 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,774ß
    I'd like to see a few more to Earl, but I do like the break down a lot.
  5. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    3,593
    Likes Received:
    638
    Ratings:
    +742 / 6 / -24
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,162ß
    I've stopped missing Greg Olsen. It's nice to have a TE who can catch a football Davis drove me absolutely crazy.
  6. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    22,515
    Likes Received:
    2,951
    Ratings:
    +3,573 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,774ß
    I was never a huge fan of Olsen, but I never believed the found a guy to replace him either. They just way over paid the new BU(black unicorn) to be Olsen, and while he might be a better blocker, he didn't show it on Sunday w/2 holding penalties. I would still love to have Eifert on this team, he looked really good, but I've now bought into Long, he played really damn well against that Bengals DL.
    • Like Like x 1
  7. ZifanQ

    ZifanQ Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,508
    Likes Received:
    142
    Ratings:
    +164 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    68ß
    I rather overpaid a TE that can actually catch the god damn ball instead of having none TE to do it. Having a legit TE just adds another dimension to Cutler/the offense which they really never had. We did have Olsen but under a coach that didn't use him corretly.
    • Like Like x 1
  8. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    22,515
    Likes Received:
    2,951
    Ratings:
    +3,573 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,774ß
    Zif, I know and agree, but the reality is they let go of Olsen before they even had a TE that could block. Davis was a big bag of suck since before they let Olsen go. He was bigger and blocked worse.

    I didn't cry over the Olsen loss, I cried b/c they didn't try and replace him in any shape way or form, not even w/a legit blocker.
    • Like Like x 1
  9. shark86x

    shark86x Pro-Bowler SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,694
    Likes Received:
    655
    Ratings:
    +786 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    433ß
    Yup, and that 1 TD grab alone was worth it. As far as the holding penalties (and the couple drops), I think that was just nerves 1st game on a new team. I'll bet he'll settle down and be worth every penny we're paying him.

Share This Page