Day Two Discussion

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Grizzblue, May 8, 2014.

  1. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,450
    Likes Received:
    684
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Well, like it or not the Fuller pick is in the books. What should/can our focus shift to now? Any chance at a quality safety is pretty much gone, so what do you think/want/expect we do?

    With safety pretty much out the window for the here and now, I'm looking for a multitude of possibilities. DT, MLB, RB, QB, and I'm sure more all possible in day two. I just don't see a justifiable safety in day two, unless we are looking for another CB who may play S.
     
  2. okay

    okay Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2014
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    33
    I don't think safety is quite as bad a need as most here do....

    Yes, our safeties both sucked last year.

    But the 2 years prior to that they were passable.

    Previously it was a case of bad safetys + excellent supporting cast = good safety play. (2012)

    Last year it was bad safetis + bad supporting cast = horrific safety play. (2013)

    This year it should end up more like bad safeties + good supporting cast (could be excellent, the talents there) = average safety play. (2014)

    If Mundy is an improvement over Wright then we're already better.

    I'm not saying our safeties are good, or even average. I'm just saying that as long as our defense isn't decimated by injuries like last year and the following happens:
    1) Defensive line generates a pass rush (didn't happen last year)
    2) Linebackers stop the run (didn't happen last year)

    Then they won't be put in positions they can't handle so often.....remember - no one was calling safety a need at the last draft.

    Take one of the following quality D linemen left in round 2:
    - Rashede Hageman
    - Timmy Jernigan
    - Louis Nix
    - Kony Ealy
    - Kareem Martin

    And that supporting cast is even better....there are 5 quality D linemen there, at least a few have to be there when the Bears pick.
     
  3. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    12,666
    Likes Received:
    3,489
    I looked at safety as probably our biggest need (although perhaps not the position that would make the most difference). Emery always has a plan. I'm not sure if in his plan he counted on all the safeties being taken prior to our second pick, but that is the situation. So we can play the convert-a-player game that we have already played several times and try to convert either a current pick or a current player to S, take a S in FA, or stay pat with the safeties we have. Emery has acknowledged bad S play, so I think if we end up with the 3rd choice it is because a plan did not work out. There is no question that now we know that CB was of more importance to Emery than S since the safeties were there and he went CB. I'm not going to second guess that because I also agree that IN GENERAL a CB is much more valuable. I am not sure that is the case for us at this point in time, but that does not really matter right now.

    If he is going to ply the convert-a-player route with a draft pick, I would be surprised if he takes a guy as high as the 2nd to play a converted role, but anything is possible.

    At this point, I would say DT, but to be sure, we are going to need a mock to confirm it.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. okay

    okay Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2014
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    33
    • Like Like x 1
  5. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Position Coach

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,143
    Likes Received:
    2,063
    S is gone as a 2nd round consideration IMO. DT next up.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  6. lklrlolnlilklsox

    lklrlolnlilklsox Position Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    6,914
    Likes Received:
    418
    I'm not tied to any position, just make sure the guy is a baller and helps us win games.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  7. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,450
    Likes Received:
    684

    I know this will be unpopular...but RB is a darkhorse if Hill is still there. Other than that, Jernigan or Hageman we can cross our fingers for but I doubt it. Fuller is growing on me, I still wonder if he is going to play safety, I think the rest of this draft will answer some questions. And before anyone quotes emery on Fuller not playing S....keep in mind I doubt he will tip his hand on the rest of the draft after one pick.
     
  8. lklrlolnlilklsox

    lklrlolnlilklsox Position Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    6,914
    Likes Received:
    418
    It's not a bad spot to gamble on Tuitt if he checked out medically.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. short faced bear

    short faced bear Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    11,320
    Likes Received:
    1,524
    I'd say look to DT in 2 and MLB but for round 3 I can see a RB. The DT from USC (name escapes me) could fall to us.
     
  10. latorreedgar

    latorreedgar Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    27
    I think it's either Louis Nix or
    Dominique Easley both had private workouts with the Bears.
    Didn't hear or see any other of the top DT's have visits with the Bears
     
  11. latorreedgar

    latorreedgar Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    27
    These are all the guys that had a visit with the Bears
    [​IMG]Chicago Bears:
    Walt Aikens, DB, Liberty (PRI)
    Anthony Barr, LB, UCLA (PRO)
    Tajh Boyd, QB, Clemson (SR)
    Xavius Boyd, LB, Western Kentucky (INT)
    Deone Bucannon, DB, Washington State (PRI)
    Ha Ha Clinton-Dix, DB, Alabama (PRI)
    Aaron Donald, DL, Pittsburgh (COM)
    Laurent Duvernay-Tardif, OT, McGill (INT)
    Dominique Easley, DL, Florida (PRI)
    Kyle Fuller%, CB, Virginia Tech (PRI) (PRO)
    Zach Fulton, OL, Tennessee (PRI)
    Marqueston Huff, DB, Wyoming (PRO)
    Kofi Hughes, WR, Indiana (PRO)
    Gabe Ikard, OL, Oklahoma (COM)
    Al Louis-Jean, DB, Boston College (PRO)
    Jordan Lynch%, QB, Northern Illinois (LOC) (COM)
    Louis Nix, DL, Notre Dame (PRI)
    Kevin Norwood, WR, Alabama (PRO)
    Calvin Pryor, DB, Louisville (PRI)
    Tommy Rees, QB, Notre Dame (PRI/PRO)
    Allen Robinson, WR, Penn State (PRO)
    Will Sutton, DL, Arizona State (PRI)
    De'Anthony Thomas, RB, Oregon (PRI)
    Chris Watt, OL, Notre Dame (PRO)
    James White, RB, Wisconsin (PRI)
     
  12. okay

    okay Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2014
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    33
    Patriots took Easley in the 1st round man!
     
  13. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,450
    Likes Received:
    684
    This may come as a shocker to some, but I actually agree to an extent. Would I take Tuitt over Jernigan? Hell no, would I take Tuitt if he slipped..yeah I would. He can play the 7 or the 3 and that would largely depend on what Houston is best suited for. I have kinda warmed up to the idea of versatility on defense, and if Houston and Tuitt lined up on the same side and could preform their respective roles well then it could be a scary situation.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,450
    Likes Received:
    684
    Thats how I see it IMO. Now if Nix fell and Jernigan and Tuitt were both off the board I wouldn't hate the pick. That would assume that Nix can stay 315 MAX and can illustrate good burst to stout up our run D.
     
  15. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    12,666
    Likes Received:
    3,489
    I was on board with a pick at 14 for a penetrating DT. Can any of the DT's left that we can get really be a penetrating, dominant DT? I'm not sure they are. If not, do we still take one? I think the DL is sound, but it needs a guy that can penetrate. If we can't get that, then I think we are just getting another guy like we already have.
     
    #15 Bearsinhouston, May 9, 2014
    Last edited: May 9, 2014
  16. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,450
    Likes Received:
    684

    For a penetrating, disruptive 3? My favorite is still Quarrles. I wouldn't be opposed to him at 51 if Jernigan, Tuitt were off the board and we are dead set on a DT. I know thats not what the "expert mocks" expect, and some will call it a reach. But regardless of who lined up next to him the man landed 9.5 sacks in the SEC. Nothing to turn your nose up at.
     
  17. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    12,666
    Likes Received:
    3,489
    Not sure he is that big a difference maker (but 9.5 sacks is in fact nothing to turn your nose up at). At this point, I'd be ok with a stud MLB, but of course the guy that we all knew would be a difference maker was long gone even before our first pick (Mack).

    There are still good DT's left, but I expect a rush on them in the first half of the 2nd.
     
  18. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,450
    Likes Received:
    684
    I agree BIH. If it lines up perfectly for us a guy like Jernigan or Hageman will slip. I would almost gaurentee that if Hageman is there at 51 Emery would jump all over it. But it's the draft and nobody know what will happen.
     
  19. BearDownUnder

    BearDownUnder Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    89
    Priority 1
    - DT - Obviously priority number 1 is to get a young DT in, with a particular focus on a 3 tech who can disrupt the back field but even a heavier stouter run blocker wouldn't be a bad pick. Ratliff and Collins offer flexibility to play either role

    Consider
    - S - the so called depth is thin but you never know how the Bears rate some of the prospects. There might be a guy with a second round grade who's yet to be drafted
    - LB - replacement for Briggs or MLB
    - Corner - 2 CB in a row would be strange but if you say this is Tillman's last year and you put Fuller in the Nickel you could then have another CB as the replacement for Tillman. It really depends how much you like Frey as a long term prospect
     
  20. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    2,151
    Likes Received:
    222
    Emery passed on Dix.
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    DaBears.com was founded in 1996. In 2005 it was created into a site for the fans of the Chicago Bears. We have become the biggest fan websites with over 10,000 members and climbing! We reformatted the site in 2013, to it's current layout. We are NOT Affiliated with the NFL, or Chicago Bears. We are a website of hardcore fans! Thanks for checking us out and come back often. We are the voice of Bears fans!
  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation

  • Buy us a Beer!

    The publisher works very hard to make sure the community is running the best software, best designs, and all the other bells and whistles. We have a pretty robust server, and more comes out of my pocket than you would imagine. Care to buy us a beer? We'd really appreciate it! After all, belonging to this is awesome, and it's free! I'm glad to foot the bill, but I do appreciate any help to keep the lights on. Become a Super Fan!