Double up on safety in 1 and 2?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by butkus3595, May 7, 2014.

  1. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,330
    Likes Received:
    616
    ßearz ßuckz:
    513ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Yep, if by some miracle that happened would be the only way 1,2 safety would be justifiable.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. butkus3595

    butkus3595
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,373ß
    I don't know that thats the only safety in 1 and 2 is justifiable. You wouldn't be excited to have a safety tandem of Ha Ha and Buchananon? All we hear about on this board is how we need a safety who can intimidate people...well thats what Buchananon can do, and he can cover, as can Ha Ha. They would be day 1 plug and play guys....without a doubt. Can you say that about any corner we would draft at that spot? Certainly can't say it about any linebacker. Any DT would be a rotational guy unless it's someone drafted at 14...and even still they'd be a rotational guy. You'd have 2 guys who would play 100% of the defensive snaps barring injury and do it well. That's certainly justifiable.

    Either way, I don't think it will happen just because I don't think Buchananon would be available when we pick in the second round, but it would solve our biggest problem right away, and the more I talk about it the more I like the idea.
     
  3. VJ18

    VJ18
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    145
    ßearz ßuckz:
    343ß
    I fully understand what you're saying but we should go after hte best person available regardless of athleticism that Emery likes
     
  4. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,690
    Likes Received:
    2,778
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,002ß
    I have been thinking that S is a good bet at 14, but the more I read about the S being weak this year and that they have not been as good as previous years, Emery is the kind of guy that just looks at cold hard facts and stats. If he feels that these guys are not worthy of a 14 pick based on comparisons to what he feels a #14 S should be, he won't take one. Not sure I agree since we need one and I think there are two that are worthy, but it would not surprise me if we did not go S based on that logic. Or I could just be outhinking myself again. Like I've never done that before...
     
  5. butkus3595

    butkus3595
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,373ß
    By the way, if Detroit drafts Sammy Watkins or Mike Evans this might be more a reality than you guys may want. We better address that secondary(safety spot) early and often.
     
  6. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,731
    Likes Received:
    2,467
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,340ß
    Yes, Safety is the biggest need ATM so get the best safety you can at 14. But if we do that, safety is no longer the top need when the second round comes along. I'd say maybe CB is will Tillman on his last leg.

    Always been a firm believer of taking the BPA based on need

    Then again we do have two good starting CBs for this coming season, and no safety.... So maybe you have a point.

    Safety 1-2
     
  7. VJ18

    VJ18
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    145
    ßearz ßuckz:
    343ß
    If we go this route i'd be very pleased

    14

    S CALVIN PRYOR
    LOUISVILLE
    51

    DT WILL SUTTON
    ARIZONA STATE
    82

    CB STANLEY JEAN- BAPTISTE
    NEBRASKA
    117

    QB A.J. MCCARRON
    ALABAMA
    156

    RB DEVONTA FREEMAN
    FLORIDA STATE
    183

    S MARQUESTON HUFF
    WYOMING
    191

    TE XAVIER GRIMBLE
    USC
     
  8. Chicago_66

    Chicago_66
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2013
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    436
    ßearz ßuckz:
    226ß
    PFfft, I'd be jumping for joy. I'd love some LB help and a higher DT but if our first two picks are Haha and Bucannon I would not be upset in the least. Honestly, it's about who can contribute. If these guys are good picks and become starters no ones going to care what position. We need playmakers at every single level and getting a starter level DL/LB/DB are all necessary. If we had two starters at safety who were competent and could start for years, I'm sold. I don't think Buc will be there in the second, but I don't know shit.. I'm excited for this draft to just get started. Desir in the third would be sick, we just fixed our secondary, on paper, in one draft.

    I'm not one to draft to spite other teams (McC so Pack couldn't grab him, Eagles taking Graham to stop G-Men from getting him).. the shit just doesn't work out. You draft people YOU believe in who can contribute to your team. But this is a very, very good point. Megatron is going to draw so much coverage and Tate has great hands. If they draft Evans or Watkins to play across from Megatron and Tate in the slot our secondary is going to be crying two games a year.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. butkus3595

    butkus3595
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    1,832
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,373ß
    Soooo given what detroit just did.....
     
  10. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,731
    Likes Received:
    2,467
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,340ß

Share This Page