Played with the simulator again got several outputs. I changed the needs inputs to get the following Originally it kept giving us a Center at pick 51 so I started bumping up 2 dt priority 2 and (m3) mulitple pick priority 3 did not like cb or s picks. Made the trade with SF gave up 14 took 30, 56, 77. liked that better decided to get a decent mock with no trades and revisit. still no ILB Since I do not see much value in S position after round 2 I changed the 2 DT pick to a M4. to move up S pick. Went back to standard draft picks Liked Bucannon moving up for S. Still not happy with CB and no ILB. Changed philosophy from DT driven to CB driven dropped DT to pri 3 from 2 with M4, CB priority 2 ss pri 3 Quarles could replace Hageman for you the Hageman haters butt with Sutton I liked CB and 2 DT, Not sure Loston will be a starter but solid backup much like everyone else we have. Still not happy with NO MLB so prioritized ILB to priority 3 from pri 4 Once again Quarles could be substituted for Hageman if you want. Got my ILB still have to wonder if picking a S is wasting a pick at this stage as we have equal talent on roster. Decided to bump Safety up SS is now a pri. 2 from a priority 3. i liked that Bailey may still add more value than Loston. Quarles vs Hageman, and Prob Bullough over Barrow as barrow more of a 3-4 ILB than MLB. Since I like my priority in drafting now I had to try the trade with San Francisco one more time. Looks pretty damn good to me. cb Roby on board for RD 1 pick but Jernigan won out. Next good value came to Baptiste in rd 3. Just playin with all the optiions. Phil I believe has done a great job and no matter what he does we are going to have a strong draft with all the options. I trust Phil to figure it all out for the Bears.