Emery said to want to re-tool the D, not rebuild. Is this the smart way to do it?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by dabears, Feb 10, 2014.

  1. BearDownUnder

    BearDownUnder Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    69
    Ratings:
    +81 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    53ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Retool = keep the same system and structure and just add in a few new tools
    Rebuild = new system, a lot of new players and coaches

    There might not be a heap of change from 2013 to 2014 with maybe 4 new starters at best, but considering how much has changed back to 2012 it's a rebuild defense.

    If there's no Urlacher, Tillman, Peppers, Melton and others not to mention no Love Smith or Marinelli from 2012 then it's a rebuild. Last year with the young and veteran FA linebackers added but not a lot of other new parts and trying to keep the same system it was a retool.
     
    #21
  2. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,892
    Likes Received:
    192
    Ratings:
    +250 / 2 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    783ß
    It still means the same thing.
     
    #22
  3. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,690
    Likes Received:
    3,650
    Ratings:
    +4,442 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,938ß
    Problem w/this theory is that Emery stated that he wants to use more scheme to confuse the O, and the old Lovie 2 has zero interest in subterfuge. So Emery has already said he wants a scheme change on top of all the player turn over.
     
    #23
    • Like Like x 1
  4. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,045
    Likes Received:
    3,746
    Ratings:
    +4,453 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,040ß
    That's another good point Ric. This is going to be more than just a change in players. It's certainly not going to be the old Lovie Smith D. It might not even be a 4-3. So, they will have changed coaches, players and scheme since '12. They will have basically nuked the D.
     
    #24
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2014
  5. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,690
    Likes Received:
    3,650
    Ratings:
    +4,442 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,938ß
    Don't expect Briggs back next when contract is up also, in another 1-2 years the D will have been completely turned over.
     
    #25
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    493
    Ratings:
    +611 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    400ß
    Unfortunately, our defense also doesn't have a head.
     
    #26
    • Like Like x 1
  7. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,431
    Likes Received:
    1,540
    Ratings:
    +2,088 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,588ß
    I for one am fine with a total nuking of our defense. No offense but Briggs isn't getting younger. I don't think we need to resign him after his contract is up. Bostic or Greene should be ready by then.
     
    #27
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    3,877
    Likes Received:
    663
    Ratings:
    +785 / 7 / -26
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,459ß
    There is only about 30 before free agency begins, and I don't see how we can enter the free agency bidding until we know for sure what is going to happen with Peppers. He is the key guy from a money standpoint.
     
    #28
  9. abegibronlives

    abegibronlives Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    99
    Ratings:
    +143 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    180ß



    We have some older players that command hefty salaries, and some will have to go. Is that re-tooling or re-building? Semantics, either way some change is in order.
     
    #29

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.