Grizz's Mock

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Grizzblue, Mar 12, 2014.

  1. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    390
    Ratings:
    +435 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    82ß
    I'd be happy with that draft.
  2. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    390
    Ratings:
    +439 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    42ß

    He needs another year of two Ric and I suspect that we are going to see some marginal improvement. There was not a sole on that defense that looked good last year, combined with being a rookie I think we have to wait and see with an open mind.
  3. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    20,994
    Likes Received:
    2,316
    Ratings:
    +2,662 / 8 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    576ß
    Ya the D sucked last year as a whole, but Bostic and Greene were embarassingly bad, rookie or not.
    I'm not saying they cannot improve, but assuming they'll improve enough to be competent starters is poor judgement imo.
  4. little bear

    little bear Assistant Head Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11,636
    Likes Received:
    580
    Ratings:
    +643 / 0 / -2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    287ß
    That's why I wanted Arthur Brown in the first place. He didn't have a great season either, but he looks like he's got more upside than Bostic.
  5. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    20,994
    Likes Received:
    2,316
    Ratings:
    +2,662 / 8 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    576ß
    Ogletree and Warford together are greater then Long and Bostic; unless Long moves to L or R T, then that changes the equation but the current OC believes the G's are more important then the T's for his scheme so I don't see that happening.

Share This Page