Grizz's Mock

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Grizzblue, Mar 12, 2014.

  1. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Position Coach
    Member of the Month

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    6,834
    Likes Received:
    3,339
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,617ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I'd be happy with that draft.
     
  2. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    684
    ßearz ßuckz:
    636ß

    He needs another year of two Ric and I suspect that we are going to see some marginal improvement. There was not a sole on that defense that looked good last year, combined with being a rookie I think we have to wait and see with an open mind.
     
  3. riczaj01

    riczaj01 George Halas
    Member of the Month DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    30,366
    Likes Received:
    7,071
    ßearz ßuckz:
    6,883ß
    Birthday CakeBandaid
    Ya the D sucked last year as a whole, but Bostic and Greene were embarassingly bad, rookie or not.
    I'm not saying they cannot improve, but assuming they'll improve enough to be competent starters is poor judgement imo.
     
  4. little bear

    little bear Head Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    18,127
    Likes Received:
    2,992
    ßearz ßuckz:
    6,627ß
    That's why I wanted Arthur Brown in the first place. He didn't have a great season either, but he looks like he's got more upside than Bostic.
     
  5. riczaj01

    riczaj01 George Halas
    Member of the Month DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    30,366
    Likes Received:
    7,071
    ßearz ßuckz:
    6,883ß
    Birthday CakeBandaid
    Ogletree and Warford together are greater then Long and Bostic; unless Long moves to L or R T, then that changes the equation but the current OC believes the G's are more important then the T's for his scheme so I don't see that happening.
     

Share This Page