I REALLY want to switch defensive philosophies next year

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by BradMustersGhost, Oct 27, 2013.

  1. BradMustersGhost

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    805
    Likes Received:
    321
    Ratings:
    +400 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    447ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    a different 4-3 philosophy, a 3-4, a 5-1-6, a 29-X-97, whatever. This is the perfect opportunity to make a clean break from Lovie and his cowardly Cover-2. It was fun watching Monte Kiffin's Cover-2 prevent fall apart in the final 49 seconds against the Lions. To me, Detroit's game-winning drive perfectly sums up the Cover-2. A skilled, intelligent, patient QB will ALWAYS kill the Cover-2 unless you have the freakin' Steel Curtain for a DL. Give me a defense with balls any day of the week, and twice on Sunday. I really hope we bury the craven Cover-2 with Lovie's old playbooks. Time to throw out the Cover-2 with the trash and adopt a high risk/high reward defense. Bring Buddy Ryan back.


    *****Since I realize some folks are gonna misinterpret my post, let me PLAINLY STATE that I am NOT blaming our defensive woes this year on the defensive philosophy. We just flat out suck on defense this year, because everyone is old, dead or injured. I have just been "over" the Cover-2 for some time now, and would like to see something different. Even when it was "working", it still gave up dink and dunk TD drives against elite QBs. Let's try something new.
     
    #1
  2. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,082
    Likes Received:
    3,340
    Ratings:
    +4,057 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,315ß
    I don't care if it's 4-3, 3-4, or whatever, but I wouldn't mind walking away from the cover 2 base. I understand the cover 2 has a place in every D, but at it's core you see the problem w/it. No front 4 pressure, no turn overs and you give up yards and scores, it becomes a bend and break D.

    I still like the idea of moving towards a 4-3, 3-4 hybrid that several teams are trying to run. Not sure it's possible in 1 year though. Next year it might be better to just go w/the 1 and run with it.
     
    #2
  3. Jimmors

    Jimmors The Rhymenoceros
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    30,548
    Likes Received:
    4,550
    Ratings:
    +4,988 / 9 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,475ß
    Cover-2, Man, Zone, doesnt matter. Our defense is entirely based on getting QB pressure and shutting down the run up the middle with nothing but our front 4. If they fail, then it puts the pressure on our LBs to do that, which means they can not be in coverage, which in turn means our Corners and Safeties are now entirely responsible for coverage, and while you can (usually) trust in Tillman and Jennings, our Safeties are a problem (Conte in particular).

    This is what happens when your defense is entirely based around a very specific philosophy and comprised of players that only suit that philosophy...if they fail, even one part of the defense, it ripples across to the rest of the D.

    For the short term, tucker is going to have to change it up and use our LBs to blitz more. That is pretty much the only thing we can do to change it up for now...it has its risks, but we do not have any other option at this point.
     
    #3
    • Like Like x 1
  4. short faced bear

    short faced bear Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,887
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Ratings:
    +1,519 / 0 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    639ß
    I want the philosophy of FUNDAMENTALS.

    That is all
     
    #4
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,878
    Likes Received:
    2,487
    Ratings:
    +2,763 / 8 / -10
    ßearz ßuckz:
    869ß
    Emery's said very publicly that we're not going to transition to a 3-4 next year, so scratch that idea. I'm in favor of getting rid of the cover 2, but I doubt it goes away, given that it's easier to fix a system predicated on a strong d-line, as there's fewer spots on the line that need fixed, than the rest of the defense.
     
    #5
  6. short faced bear

    short faced bear Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,887
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Ratings:
    +1,519 / 0 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    639ß
    I'm scared that now we're using old terminology so things would go smoothly. I shudder to think what happens when Tucker uses his own complex terms lol.
     
    #6
  7. Jimmors

    Jimmors The Rhymenoceros
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    30,548
    Likes Received:
    4,550
    Ratings:
    +4,988 / 9 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,475ß
    Its not like the defense are all idiots or something. Besides, Tucker has only had a few months to set up his defense, he lost a couple of key pieces, and nobody could have predicted that Peppers would have fallen off so quickly, or that we would suffer from so many injuries. I have been highly critical of Tucker all year, but im willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, and see if the defense does better under him next season before im willing to throw him under the bus.
     
    #7
    • Like Like x 2
  8. short faced bear

    short faced bear Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,887
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Ratings:
    +1,519 / 0 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    639ß
    PDQM

    -thank you
     
    #8
  9. Jimmors

    Jimmors The Rhymenoceros
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    30,548
    Likes Received:
    4,550
    Ratings:
    +4,988 / 9 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,475ß
    Again...no idea what that means. So youre welcome i guess.
     
    #9
  10. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    3,765
    Likes Received:
    654
    Ratings:
    +775 / 7 / -26
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,341ß
    I saw an interview with Drew Brees. He said you can't play great Cover-2 unless you have a smart and athletic MLB. Now that Urlacher is gone,we don't have that. We also don't have safeties who can cover deep worth a damn. Nor do we have a pass rusher. I don't see how we can possibly fix all these things in 2014, unless our rookies develop fast.

    Don Schuler might be able to pull it off, but Mel Tucker ain't no Don Schuler.
     
    #10

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.