If you could only guarantee ONE issue is fixed next year

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Henry Burris, Apr 17, 2014.

?

Which one?

  1. Pass Rush

    52.4%
  2. Rush Defense

    42.9%
  3. Offensive Turnovers (Cutler)

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. *added too many, could a mod remove this option?*

    4.8%
  1. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,959
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    ßearz ßuckz:
    953ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    This should be self-explanatory, but here we go: if you could only guarantee that one of our team's flaws could be fixed completely (like, at an elite level), which would you choose? Explain yourself, and NO, injuries should not be an option.

    I had to go with the run defense, because, while Cutler can have some bad games, and Conte has shown that he's not all that great in pass coverage, Cutler has increasingly had more good games than bad the past couple years and Conte has found himself to be in the right place at the right time more than a few times, when the quarterback is getting rushed. However, if we're giving up over 150 yards a game, the defense will be tired and opposing quarterbacks' jobs become incredibly easy.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. mdbearz

    mdbearz Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    370
    ßearz ßuckz:
    246ß
    I still believe that the League in general is a passing league, so if you can fix the pass rush then Conte and whoever ends up being the other Safety and the CBs can get turnovers, sacks, and fumbles.

    the 4-3 defense is dependent on a 3 tech for a reason. And I know a run defense is important, but if it is only 1 thing that we can fix, I thing the pass rush has more of an impact.

    BTW, the reality is the Rush defense should be better this year with the guys we picked up.
     
  3. draw2anderson35

    draw2anderson35 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    83
    ßearz ßuckz:
    28ß
    Rush defense.

    Establishing an adequate running action plus the play action still destroys nearly any defense! Towards the end of the year the defense was so worried about the run first those initial 1-2 steps towards the line of scrimmage at the snap left many of receivers open when the QB pulled the ball back from the RB. If we can manage not having to load up the box to compensate for team's running up our gut than a lot of other aspects of the defense improves.

    I think on paper in reality we improved our pass rush with the DE additions. The lack of addressing the interior (DT / MLB) still leaves doubt on the run defense issue being plugged up.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,650
    Likes Received:
    2,455
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,258ß
    Define fixed.

    Personally id like my QB's health to be fixed
     
  5. soulman

    soulman Coordinator
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    8,160
    Likes Received:
    2,469
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,133ß
    It's gotta be the pass rush. With Ratliff playing in the middle and DWill back plus Houston at LDE, where we were extremely vulnerable, I think the run defense will take care of itself. To beat the teams we're facing we need constant pressure on QBs. To win the NFCN we have to beat the Packers and the only way to do that is to nullify Rodgers. To nullify him you have to keep him from making plays with is feet and get a strong push up the middle so he can't step up away from the DEs. Take him out of his game and we win.
     
  6. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    615
    ßearz ßuckz:
    512ß
    I know that the league has evolved into a passing league but one thing of football will never change. You must be able to stop the run, and run the ball and you will be successful. Even if you don't use your rushing attack as much, you must be able to do it, have that threat. When teams are running for 6 yards a carry and your FS is being asked to make about 8 too many tackles a game, your entire defense doesn't have much of a chance. While pass rush is a close 2nd, I'm going with stop the run. I will note that both stopping the run and running the ball stems form the DL, so I wish I could go with DL in general.
     
  7. VJ18

    VJ18 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    145
    ßearz ßuckz:
    343ß
    the secondary
     
  8. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,959
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    ßearz ßuckz:
    953ß
    Lacy will destroy us if further measures aren't taken to ensure our run D will beb significantly better than last year.
     
  9. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,604
    Likes Received:
    3,977
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,878ß
    Seeing as I believe the passrush and rush D was already fixed I'd say I'd want to remove too many options.
     
  10. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,442
    Likes Received:
    2,696
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,752ß
    I have worked with execs similar to Emery in the past. Very focused, smart individuals that keep their eye on the ball. If I had to bet, Emery is going to go after what HE percieves is going to make the club move closer to winning a SB.
    The biggest hole IMO opinion right now is the secondary. I would not be at all surprised if he felt that fixing the secondary is going to provide the biggest upgrade. I am sure he will also look for value, and of course the actual individual is of extreme performance in his calculations. No one, including Emery knows who the individuals he will have to choose from are at this point. I also don't know how he and his coaches have valued the pass rush vs the run defense vs the secondary. I just know that I see he has fixed a great deal on the DL and I see the biggest hole right now in the secondary and it would not surprise me at all if he goes after that first.

    After it's all said and done, I'm not sure this post has added anything because this is all stuff we have talked about ad nauseum...
     

Share This Page