Insite into Trestmans thought on 3-4 defense

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by BSBEARS, Feb 11, 2014.

  1. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,649
    Likes Received:
    1,507
  2. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    SuperFan Member of the Month DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    16,979
    Likes Received:
    6,074
    From that article it seems like Trestman, from an offense perspective, considers an opposing 3-4 defense more challenging than a 4-3. If he ultimately would like to have a 3-4 defense in Chicago, then this would be a rare opportunity for him to make the switch, due to the fact there will be a number of key roster changes on D anyway. It may not be so easy to switch in other years. If he wants a 3-4 or 3-4 hybrid, then this is his chance.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    4,649
    Likes Received:
    1,507
    Pretty much my take as well:5_5_1[1]:
     
  4. JJ-30

    JJ-30 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    551
    Have to agree with both of you. Since we are retooling the Defense this would seem to as good a time as any.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. mshu7

    mshu7 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    175
    Agreed. Do it now, or forever hold your peace!
     
  6. VJ18

    VJ18 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    156
    agreed with you guys, i mean how much worse could we be from last year? ha
     
  7. billatter

    billatter Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    308
    I like the defensive perspective, of "what scheme is hard to play against" vs. "I like this scheme best, because I'm the boss". I like the 3-4 because of the creativity it offers the DC. The 3-4 is a situational D up here, but because the front seven are so big in the NFL, I can see it as an "almost every down' D. My preference is for a hybrid that plays mostly 3-4, but will happily switch to a 4-3 when the O finds a way to exploit a 3-4 weakness, or when it makes sense for the situation (i.e. third and long, send four on the rush and have two LBs and a hybrid dropping in coverage). I've always favoured schemes that have the flexibility to counter or exploit the opposition, rather than the simplistic, plough ahead regardless mentality.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  8. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    2,237
    Likes Received:
    246
    We seem to have enough LB's to get a 3-4 defense going. Get a NT type and a DL,and then go secondary. Not in that order,BPA at each pick.
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    DaBears.com was founded in 1996. In 2005 it was created into a site for the fans of the Chicago Bears. We have become the biggest fan websites with over 10,000 members and climbing! We reformatted the site in 2013, to it's current layout. We are NOT Affiliated with the NFL, or Chicago Bears. We are a website of hardcore fans! Thanks for checking us out and come back often. We are the voice of Bears fans!
  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation

  • Buy us a Beer!

    The publisher works very hard to make sure the community is running the best software, best designs, and all the other bells and whistles. We have a pretty robust server, and more comes out of my pocket than you would imagine. Care to buy us a beer? We'd really appreciate it! After all, belonging to this is awesome, and it's free! I'm glad to foot the bill, but I do appreciate any help to keep the lights on. Become a Super Fan!