Interesting simulator of all historical teams

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Henry Burris, Apr 15, 2014.

  1. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,899
    Likes Received:
    2,489
    Ratings:
    +2,766 / 8 / -10
    ßearz ßuckz:
    892ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    http://www.whatifsports.com/nfl/default.asp#top

    Apparently the 2012 Bears would destroy the 2013 Bears, the 98 Falcons were a GREAT team (lol), and the 06 Bears were horrible without Grossman (put in Griese and have them play...)
     
    #1
  2. Ski-Whiz

    Ski-Whiz George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 1996
    Messages:
    37,214
    Likes Received:
    910
    Ratings:
    +1,229 / 1 / -2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,104ß
    Capture.PNG


    This pretty much tells me alot about the validity of this site. I love the idea, but come on, 85' Bears vs 13' Bears? Only a three point game?

    Cool idea though.
     
    #2
    • Like Like x 2
  3. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    9,203
    Likes Received:
    2,338
    Ratings:
    +3,431 / 13 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,493ß
    Hilarious. Not even close. I know. Use the computer draft simulator to see what we do in 2014 and then plug the 2014 Bears vs the 1985 Bears. I'm sure that will be even more accurate!

    We were not a very good team in 2013 and teams that were quite a bit better than us got taken apart by Seattle. We would have done even worse. And it is far to say that the 1985 Bears were at least as good as Seattle was last year IMO.
     
    #3
  4. Ski-Whiz

    Ski-Whiz George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 1996
    Messages:
    37,214
    Likes Received:
    910
    Ratings:
    +1,229 / 1 / -2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,104ß
    I think this site is cool. I love how it throws the stats out there.

    I think with some REALISTIC tweaking, this could be really cool.

    In it's current state it's not close, yet.
     
    #4
  5. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,899
    Likes Received:
    2,489
    Ratings:
    +2,766 / 8 / -10
    ßearz ßuckz:
    892ß
    That's incredibly weird, given that I couldn't find a way to keep the 2013 Bears anywhere NEAR the 2012 Bears.
     
    #5
  6. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    583
    Ratings:
    +673 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    466ß
    Hate comparisons old to new but cool idea. Impossible to tell how older teams would do ESP with the athletic and physical difference now. Players now are just bigger faster stronger for the most part.
     
    #6
  7. shark86x

    shark86x Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,040
    Likes Received:
    835
    Ratings:
    +1,034 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    796ß
    I thought the results were pretty accurate....


    [​IMG]



    I gave the 2013 bears a balanced offense, and the 85 a run favored offense.
     
    #7
  8. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    9,203
    Likes Received:
    2,338
    Ratings:
    +3,431 / 13 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,493ß
    That seems to reflect what would happen much more closely
     
    #8
  9. little bear

    little bear Assistant Head Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    14,276
    Likes Received:
    1,563
    Ratings:
    +1,910 / 3 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,109ß
    Would love to see the 85 Bears playing the 2008 Pussycats.

    :bouncesm:
     
    #9

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.