NFL Rumors: Chicago Bears could sign Darren Sproles to replace Devin Hester

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by The Benjamin, Mar 10, 2014.

  1. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,706
    Likes Received:
    2,467
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,314ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    By Josh Hill - Mar 8th, 2014 at 11:01 am

    [​IMG]
    The Chicago Bears are looking to improve their roster as a whole — with an emphasis on defensive positions — and this upcoming free agency period could be big for the team. One name that is a late arrival to the party is recently released Saints speedster Darren Sproles.

    According to NFL scribe Dan Pompei, the Bears and Sproles could make a natural fit, especially considering they’re going to be losing Devin Hester to free agency this upcoming week.

    Per Pompei:

    Sproles would be an outstanding fit for the Bears. He could replace Devin Hester as the return man. And he would be an excellent change of pace back who could contribute as a receiver out of the backfield. He is 30 years old, but he still played very well last year. I think Marc Trestman could do some really creative things with a player like Sproles.

    While it makes sense for the Bears to add a speedy offensive threat like Sproles, Pompei points out some flaws. From constraints that may be put on him in Marc Trestman’s offense to the issue of other teams offering more money, the idea of Sproles landing in Chicago isn’t a that high.

    It’s not impossible though and will likely be something that is explored when the Free Agent tampering period opens.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. little bear

    little bear
    Expand Collapse
    Head Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    15,353
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,321ß
    That wouldn't be a bad idea at all. He's old but he could be our backup RB and also return kicks and punts with Williams.
     
  3. BearDown425

    BearDown425
    Expand Collapse
    Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2014
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    10ß
    this would be a great addition if we could snag him
     
  4. BearDownUnder

    BearDownUnder
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    80
    ßearz ßuckz:
    76ß
    Does Hester + Bush = Sproles in terms of output and cost? I think Sproles would be an upgrade but too expensive. Might be better going with a young RB who can return kicks and putting that money in to defense.
     
  5. Bear_40

    Bear_40
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    336
    Likes Received:
    94
    ßearz ßuckz:
    261ß
    This would be a good play. A multi-dimensional player leaving space for other ares whee we need help.
     
  6. 4th and 26

    4th and 26
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    39,090
    Likes Received:
    771
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,006ß
    I think this would be a good signing.
     
  7. MPbears68

    MPbears68
    Expand Collapse
    Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,275
    Likes Received:
    1,695
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,336ß
    What is a realistic number for him contract-wise?
     
  8. butkus3595

    butkus3595
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    4,175
    Likes Received:
    1,819
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,340ß
    I'd be ecstatic!
     
  9. short faced bear

    short faced bear
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    11,087
    Likes Received:
    1,448
    ßearz ßuckz:
    840ß
    I think Emery will bring in a surprise offensive pick-I'll cross my fingers that it's Sproles.
     
  10. Seqq34

    Seqq34
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    151
    ßearz ßuckz:
    265ß
    IMO they need to just worry about the Defense for now. I know you can't neglect any side of the ball at any time, but would they be putting too much talent on the offensive side? And is it something that's needed? And of course at what cost?

    If they pump more cash into the offensive side, I'd rather see another position like solid O-line backups, or a second TE..
     

Share This Page