NFL to make some major changes to the Pro-bowl

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Jimmors, Jul 31, 2013.

  1. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    18,698
    Likes Received:
    1,796
    Trophy Points:
    113
    2 things:

    A coach doesn't GAF if he's got home field locked up, about a rival game, when viewing the bigger picture.

    Hester is pissed about the rule change, and I concur completely.
  2. soulman

    soulman

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,815
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I like it, I like it. :D
  3. soulman

    soulman

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,815
    Likes Received:
    717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm staring a "Fire Goddell, Hire MPbears68" movement. I really like these idea and I think the NFLPA would bite on it as long as the roster sizes were increased and the players got revenues from those two games. And you're right about the strategizing. This gets interesting.
  4. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    4,450
    Likes Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A tie-in to fantasy football?! I say turn it into a fantasy game and lets just pretend they played it. Done and done. Just get rid of it.
  5. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    4,450
    Likes Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't want to see a mandatory limit on the player games. Take Cutler out for two games and you lose two. I think it should be a skill that coaches need to develop. Just like in horse racing (not that I am real knowledeable, but still). You have to know when to conserve your horse and when to make your push. It adds another element to the coaching chess match. If you have a borderline injured player, you have to know how to nurse him through the season, whether it means replacing him when the team has a big lead, putting in less "wear and tear" plays when you can get away with it (therefore knowing when the time is right), etc. I also think upping the players is a good idea maybe even up to 60 or so.
  6. MPbears68

    MPbears68

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's the same for every team, BiH. I just put that provision in there as a hypothetical because you know plenty of people are going to argue against an 18 game RS on "player longevity and safety" grounds. Including the NFLPA. The main problems are:
    The Pro Bowl sucks.
    Pre-season games suck only slightly less (and cost STHs full price!).
    The NFL RS is the shortest among major sports.
    The month of February is DEAD sports-wise and represents an untapped market for the NFL

    The details of getting the above done are just details.
  7. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    4,450
    Likes Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know. It was meant as just a throw out strting point, and of course it would be the same for all teams, but I just didn't like the vet limit. Let's add a little bit to the game and see what coaches and trainers can keep more of their players healthy for 2 more games. That's all I meant. just ditch that part of it. Again, just a discussion point.

Share This Page