POLL: How good of a defense do you think we need to get a Super Bowl win?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Jan 15, 2014.

?

How good of a defense do you think we NEED to get a Super Bowl win?

  1. We need to be a top-5 defense to win a Super Bowl.

    4 vote(s)
    12.1%
  2. We need to be a top-10 defense to win a Super Bowl.

    15 vote(s)
    45.5%
  3. We need to be a top-15 defense to win a Super Bowl.

    12 vote(s)
    36.4%
  4. We need to be a top-20 defense to win a Super Bowl.

    2 vote(s)
    6.1%
  5. We need to be a top-25 defense to win a Super Bowl.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. It doesn't matter because the offense will be good enough to off-set even the worst defense.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,715
    Likes Received:
    2,467
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,324ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Bears lost a lot of close games. They just need a defense that will do enough to keep the team in the game. They need the opposite of what they had in 2005, 2006. Then they needed an offense who would not throw the game away because the defense would do enough to win.
     
  2. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    2,019
    Likes Received:
    204
    ßearz ßuckz:
    918ß
    Check it out Benji ... a few simple key changes to make the past pertinent.
     
  3. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,628
    Likes Received:
    2,751
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,940ß
    yeah. A marginally good D would have gotten them into the post season. A marginally good defense would have gotten them killed against any of the last 4 teams in the playoffs.
     
  4. KenMasters

    KenMasters
    Expand Collapse
    Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2014
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    37
    ßearz ßuckz:
    93ß
    We definitely need a top 10 defense. But I just dont see it happening with Tucker. Our defense was just ridiculously bad.

    2012 - Bears Defense
    #5 in YPG(Yards per game)
    #4 YPP(yards per play)
    #3 Pts/Game

    2013 - Bears Defense
    #32 YPP
    #31 Pts/Game
    #30 YPG
    Even with injuries, thats an insane drop off.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. omc1969

    omc1969
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    196
    ßearz ßuckz:
    50ß
    With the "O" that Emery and Trestman have put together, a top 10 "D" would certainly be enough to go to the S.B.
    Special Teams need to be taken into account as well.
     
  6. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,628
    Likes Received:
    2,751
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,940ß
    Yes, we don't need a top 5 D with this O, but IMO we still need a top 10 D to have a real shot at the SB
     
  7. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,846
    Likes Received:
    4,058
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,131ß
    now name the players from last year and this year.

    +Peppers(was on the verge of to old last year, was this year)
    Wootton at DT, not DE
    +Peae played hurt most the year
    +Shea was a starter,
    No Izzy and his replacement retired
    No Briggs a good portion of the year
    No Urlacher, and his replacement hurt
    No Roach, and his replacement actually outplayed him
    +Jennings
    No Tillman most the year
    +Major Wrong
    + Chris Conte

    6 out of 11 almost 50% turnover and only 2 key players were there for the season(Jennings/Peppers)

    So you are comparing last years D to this last years D when there is no comparision to be made.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  8. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    13,211
    Likes Received:
    4,203
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,286ß
    I'm fine with the primary focus/importance being changed from defense to offense, when we let Lovie go and hired Marc Trestman. I just don't want to see us go from one extreme (really bad offense) to the other extreme (really bad defense). There has to be a "sweet spot" in the middle where the team weakness, is not too weak. I just want a defense that can do an above average job. If our offense becomes what I think it can be, then the defense can be top-10ish, and we're good to go for being a solid team. I think we can then challenge Green Bay for supremacy in the division, and when we do go back to the playoffs again (it seems like it's been forever since we've been there), we can actually compete well with the playoff teams.

    I'm hoping Emery and Trestman know what they are doing with the defense in general and with retaining Mel Tucker in particular. If they whiff here on Tucker, then we've lost another year. And those years of not making the playoffs & mediocre Bears teams, add up so futility. I'm sick of it.
     
  9. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    2,019
    Likes Received:
    204
    ßearz ßuckz:
    918ß
    Im thinkin the 2015 season ... BUT I have seen more from a team (s) in order to turn it around fast.

    Seattle and Frisco come to mind. We have every right to be in that catagory.
     
  10. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,846
    Likes Received:
    4,058
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,131ß
    I don't think the intent was to go from one extreme to the other, the problem came in their over valuation of their depth guys and their D misses in the draft(which Emery now admits to), and age finally creaping up on them, and of course it goes w/out saying inj.

    Emery told us the D is going to get younger, say bye to guys like Tillman and Peppers, Anderson while I think he deserves to be re signed probably won't be b/c of the glut at OLB. DJ, while I think they do resign him to another 1 yr deal, it's probably not going to happen in reality either he's 31, that's not getting younger. Chances are they drop out of 14 and probably grab another 2nd or 3rd pick just to help also. A draft guy was on the score, and he said in the 20 years he's done this he's never graded so many quality players in the draft; even last year he had a hard time grading quality through the 7th and this year he's got well past 32 7th round graded players.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page