Pondering what Chicago's D might be in '14

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Feb 28, 2014.

  1. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    13,243
    Likes Received:
    4,219
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,319ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I found this interesting. It explains some reasons why the D was doomed from the start last season. Maybe none of the mess was Mel's fault after all. This goes beyond just making the injury excuse.

     
  2. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris
    Expand Collapse
    Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,959
    Likes Received:
    2,514
    ßearz ßuckz:
    953ß
    Yeah, and if the defense gets significantly better, I'm going to throw that in everyone's faces for saying Tucker was the problem. After re-stocking the defense, and if they can avoid injury, we'll have a better idea of what Tucker's vision is going to be. Either way, it's not going to be as hard to fix as it usually would be, considering our RB was #2 in rushing, our receivers are best in the league and even our backup QB had starter numbers.
     
  3. 4dabers

    4dabers
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,284
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    ßearz ßuckz:
    696ß
    I like the sound of it. Give me tough and hungry any day, but please...make sure they have talent as well.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. mdbearz

    mdbearz
    Expand Collapse
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    845
    Likes Received:
    373
    ßearz ßuckz:
    258ß
    Not holding my breath, but i sure hope that Tucker turns it around.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. dachuckster

    dachuckster
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    1,631
    Likes Received:
    733
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,368ß
    Since Emery says the D will be younger in 14, I assume the bulk of the new faces n the D will be via the draft (or UDFA). Not saying we won't get a player or two in FA. So I guess we will have a very young developing unit on D.

    The new positional coaches will really have to show they know how to teach and develop young players.
     
  6. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,884
    Likes Received:
    4,067
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,169ß
    Lets see what FA and the draft bring, then we'll have a better idea of what Tucker wants. I' m pretty positive it's not a oft injured, old, historically bad system.
     

Share This Page