QBR is NOT a better indication of play than Passer Rating

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Henry Burris, Sep 11, 2013.

  1. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris DaBears Ditka

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    20,306
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    [​IMG]

    Peyton Manning just tied the all time mark for QB's, Andrew Luck played against the worst secondary in the NFL, and Jay and Andy each had a good game, but better than Manning's performance? LOL
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    52,327
    Likes Received:
    3,951
    When the formula is too hard to understand, it is not worth using :D
     
  3. MikeGolf97

    MikeGolf97 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    661
    Likes Received:
    238
    Some crap ESPN put together and tries to push down peoples throat, everyone else uses old system.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. MarkBear

    MarkBear Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    545
    Likes Received:
    110
    That is very sexy....
     
  5. soulman

    soulman Coordinator
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    9,173
    Likes Received:
    2,824
    The only rating that really counts is games won vs games lost. Most of the rest is just fluff the stats nerds love to compile.
     
  6. riczaj01

    riczaj01 George Halas
    Member of the Month DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    30,256
    Likes Received:
    7,032
    I liked the idea behind QBR, but it just doesn't work. What really needs to be done is a recalculation of the passer rating.

    wins and losses are a "team" stat and give no indication of how well the qb played or anyone else. You have to use individual stats to look into how well they played in those wins and losses.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. shark86x

    shark86x Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    3,069
    Likes Received:
    1,408
    Yup. When the ball hits the receiver in the hands, why should the QB rating suffer? Problem is, somebody has to sit down and manually review every play to assign +/- to the QB vs. his receivers etc. and that can become very subjective.
     
  8. riczaj01

    riczaj01 George Halas
    Member of the Month DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    30,256
    Likes Received:
    7,032
    But if that is all that the QBR did, and not try to assign importance of qtr and being up or down on the scoreboard then the qbr would actually be better b/c that's what they do anyways.

    Problem w/QBR is they went to far and it's very subjective. If the QB throws the ball out of bounds to avoid the sack, or to kill the play, then it's really not a pass attempt. Simple, take the subjectivity out of it, if the WR has it in his hands, not just fingertips, then it's on him to catch it.

    Same w/Int's, if the pass gets bobbled by the WR and is int'd, it shouldn't go against the qb.

    On Sun-Tues have the unadjusted passer rating, and then by thurs have the adjusted PR, and it would be awesome.

    QBR just blows. Reality is, if the QB threw for 3 TD's in the 1st, then he still killed the other team or their ability to come back, and if in the 3rd or 4th that same qb throws another 2, then those TD's shouldn't count as less b/c they came in a blow out. 3 td's in the 1st are just as imporant as 3 in the 4th is all I'm saying.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris DaBears Ditka

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    20,306
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    To a certain degree, yes. However, it would be unwise to disregard everything because it's not strictly win/loss, at least in relation to the QB ratings.
    ^^^^^This. I also think agree with MG97 that ESPN's using this as a lot of "cross-self promotion". While neither system is perfect, I've always been a fan of the original rating, and, repeating what I said earlier, that Luck (played against possibly the worst secondary), Dalton and Cutler (2 players that played amazing against good defenses, but not flawless) and Kaepernick (Horrible Pack defense, hell, I think Aaron Rodgers was more impressive, TBH) are ahead of Manning is my "breaking point" with treating it as an equal to the old system(which I do believe is also flawed). Now, if someone or a group that isn't doing so for self-promotion tries to figure out a better sabermetric of total QB play, I'm open to listen to it.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    DaBears.com was founded in 1996. In 2005 it was created into a site for the fans of the Chicago Bears. We have become the biggest fan websites with over 10,000 members and climbing! We reformatted the site in 2013, to it's current layout. We are NOT Affiliated with the NFL, or Chicago Bears. We are a website of hardcore fans! Thanks for checking us out and come back often. We are the voice of Bears fans!
  • Quick Navigation

    Open the Quick Navigation

  • Buy us a Beer!

    The publisher works very hard to make sure the community is running the best software, best designs, and all the other bells and whistles. We have a pretty robust server, and more comes out of my pocket than you would imagine. Care to buy us a beer? We'd really appreciate it! After all, belonging to this is awesome, and it's free! I'm glad to foot the bill, but I do appreciate any help to keep the lights on. Become a Super Fan!