rosario or scheffler

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by beardownboilerup, Oct 23, 2013.

  1. beardownboilerup

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    #1
  2. omc1969

    omc1969 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    189
    Ratings:
    +216 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    37ß
    If the LIONS released him then why on earth would we pick him up unless he can play DT.
    :p
     
    #2
  3. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    406
    Ratings:
    +505 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    255ß
    We did just let Maneri go. Maybe we could replace him with an actual receiving threat that can catch a ball and block.
     
    #3
  4. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,454
    Likes Received:
    3,385
    Ratings:
    +4,025 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,401ß
    We have nobody worth anything behind Martellus Bennett. Nobody who can catch a football.
     
    #4
  5. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    406
    Ratings:
    +505 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    255ß
    Maneri is gone, so we might just be thinking about adding Scheffler to get the band back together.
     
    #5
    • Like Like x 2
  6. beardownboilerup

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    i just saw that maoeki was released too, if he could stay healthy we would have two legit receiving tightends.
     
    #6
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2013
  7. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,726
    Likes Received:
    1,388
    Ratings:
    +1,730 / 2 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    786ß
    Frankly if either of these two is healthy and would come cheap, it would eliminate one offensive need we have for next season, so Emery could devote more resources to restocking the D. Ether of these two would at least give us a plausible receiver at TE opposing defenses wouldn't be able to laugh off when Marty needs a breather.

    Maneri and Rosario don't even need to be covered practically.
     
    #7
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,082
    Likes Received:
    3,341
    Ratings:
    +4,058 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,315ß
    cost is a problem here, his cap is going to be to much, and(sadly) I hear the plan is to move up Fendi On-a-Bun
     
    #8
  9. draw2anderson35

    draw2anderson35 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    83
    Ratings:
    +101 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    27ß
    When the roster spot was needed for Palmer ... Maneri was the easiest cut to make since Trestman & Kromer have been using Britton as the blocking TE in most situations.

    If anything I'm still trying to figure out why Trestman used a 7th rd pick to get Rosario. He hasn't brought anything that any TE scab off of a practice squad could have brought to the team.
     
    #9
  10. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    406
    Ratings:
    +505 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    255ß
    Man, I hope not. The hope here to get a tight end in there that can catch a ball. Defense would actively not cover Fendi in hopes we would waste a throw to him.
     
    #10

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.