The 4-3 defense is gaining popularity

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Sep 26, 2013.

  1. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,995
    Likes Received:
    4,125
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,064ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I've noticed the Cowboys seem to have a better defense now that they've switched to a 4-3, and other teams have too. Does anyone here really want to see the Bears go to a 3-4? I don't. I have always liked a 4-3 over the 3-4.

    This is from 2012

     
  2. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,995
    Likes Received:
    4,125
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,064ß
    It's not the scheme, so much as the quality of the athletes that you have IN the scheme - and the DC running it.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  3. tbear1

    tbear1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    765
    Likes Received:
    278
    ßearz ßuckz:
    401ß
    Bring back the 46.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,997
    Likes Received:
    203
    ßearz ßuckz:
    896ß
    Yeah when Capers put the 3-4 in at G.B. and they won the superbowl it was a "me too" craze for awhile.
    But then G.B. defense sucked after that and it seems the switch is back to 4-3.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  5. A-11

    A-11 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    70
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3-4 or 4-3, There is good and bad with both. I think the advantage is in having the one that is used less in your division.

    I actually like the hybrid mix, especially if you have the extremely versatile players that allow you switch around without having the personnel substitutions to key on.

    A lot of Elephants. It's fun to watch the amoebae create uncertainty.

    The Bears would need a NT the most, imo.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff Yes, in the woods.
    Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,921
    Likes Received:
    1,166
    ßearz ßuckz:
    810ß
    It's all cyclical. The read option is nothing but a new name for the triple option, regurgitated from the college ranks. I knew they'd come back to 4-3 at some point.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. lklrlolnlilklsox

    lklrlolnlilklsox Position Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    6,786
    Likes Received:
    365
    ßearz ßuckz:
    256ß
    I'm believer in the 4-3, but I'm a bigger believer in flexibility and creating as much chaos and confusion for today's aerial attacks as humanly possible. That means being eclectic schemers and having a versatile depth chart.
     
    • Like Like x 5
  8. Mr. Deliverance

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    ßearz ßuckz:
    I prefer a 4-3 because the 4-3 Cover 2 CHI runs requires a 3technique DT that can rush the passer and 2 DEs that can do so as well. Then you need 3 LBs that shorten the field for your DBs.

    Its so much easier to draft for a 3-4 defense. We need to wize up and go the way of the 3-4. Its time to stop being so nostalgic and time to start evolving with the times. LBs are more athletic than ever before. I'm all for a 3-4 move.
     
  9. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,648
    Likes Received:
    2,455
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,256ß
    So..... you prefer a 4-3, but think the Bears need to wise up and go 3-4?
     
  10. Mr. Deliverance

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    ßearz ßuckz:
    LOL Meant to post I prefer a 3-4.
     

Share This Page