The 4-3 defense is gaining popularity

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Sep 26, 2013.

  1. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,243
    Likes Received:
    3,838
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,262ß
    Ratings:
    +4,581 / 4 / -1
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I've noticed the Cowboys seem to have a better defense now that they've switched to a 4-3, and other teams have too. Does anyone here really want to see the Bears go to a 3-4? I don't. I have always liked a 4-3 over the 3-4.

    This is from 2012

     
    #1
  2. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,243
    Likes Received:
    3,838
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,262ß
    Ratings:
    +4,581 / 4 / -1
    It's not the scheme, so much as the quality of the athletes that you have IN the scheme - and the DC running it.
     
    #2
    • Like Like x 3
  3. tbear1

    tbear1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    276
    ßearz ßuckz:
    377ß
    Ratings:
    +341 / 1 / -0
    Bring back the 46.
     
    #3
    • Like Like x 1
  4. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,908
    Likes Received:
    192
    ßearz ßuckz:
    801ß
    Ratings:
    +250 / 2 / -1
    Yeah when Capers put the 3-4 in at G.B. and they won the superbowl it was a "me too" craze for awhile.
    But then G.B. defense sucked after that and it seems the switch is back to 4-3.
     
    #4
    • Like Like x 3
  5. A-11

    A-11 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    70
    ßearz ßuckz:
    Ratings:
    +74 / 1 / -0
    3-4 or 4-3, There is good and bad with both. I think the advantage is in having the one that is used less in your division.

    I actually like the hybrid mix, especially if you have the extremely versatile players that allow you switch around without having the personnel substitutions to key on.

    A lot of Elephants. It's fun to watch the amoebae create uncertainty.

    The Bears would need a NT the most, imo.
     
    #5
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff Yes, in the woods.
    Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,883
    Likes Received:
    1,140
    ßearz ßuckz:
    769ß
    Ratings:
    +1,381 / 3 / -3
    It's all cyclical. The read option is nothing but a new name for the triple option, regurgitated from the college ranks. I knew they'd come back to 4-3 at some point.
     
    #6
    • Like Like x 2
  7. lklrlolnlilklsox

    lklrlolnlilklsox Position Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    6,741
    Likes Received:
    347
    ßearz ßuckz:
    211ß
    Ratings:
    +407 / 1 / -0
    I'm believer in the 4-3, but I'm a bigger believer in flexibility and creating as much chaos and confusion for today's aerial attacks as humanly possible. That means being eclectic schemers and having a versatile depth chart.
     
    #7
    • Like Like x 5
  8. Mr. Deliverance

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    ßearz ßuckz:
    Ratings:
    +109 / 0 / -1
    I prefer a 4-3 because the 4-3 Cover 2 CHI runs requires a 3technique DT that can rush the passer and 2 DEs that can do so as well. Then you need 3 LBs that shorten the field for your DBs.

    Its so much easier to draft for a 3-4 defense. We need to wize up and go the way of the 3-4. Its time to stop being so nostalgic and time to start evolving with the times. LBs are more athletic than ever before. I'm all for a 3-4 move.
     
    #8
  9. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,404
    Likes Received:
    2,390
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,989ß
    Ratings:
    +2,835 / 7 / -9
    So..... you prefer a 4-3, but think the Bears need to wise up and go 3-4?
     
    #9
  10. Mr. Deliverance

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    ßearz ßuckz:
    Ratings:
    +109 / 0 / -1
    LOL Meant to post I prefer a 3-4.
     
    #10

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.