The 4-3 defense is gaining popularity

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Sep 26, 2013.

  1. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Coordinator SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,107
    Likes Received:
    2,101
    Ratings:
    +2,402 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    819ß
    I've noticed the Cowboys seem to have a better defense now that they've switched to a 4-3, and other teams have too. Does anyone here really want to see the Bears go to a 3-4? I don't. I have always liked a 4-3 over the 3-4.

    This is from 2012

  2. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Coordinator SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,107
    Likes Received:
    2,101
    Ratings:
    +2,402 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    819ß
    It's not the scheme, so much as the quality of the athletes that you have IN the scheme - and the DC running it.
    • Like Like x 3
  3. tbear1

    tbear1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    435
    Likes Received:
    128
    Ratings:
    +162 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    65ß
    Bring back the 46.
    • Like Like x 1
  4. jackiejokeman

    jackiejokeman Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,497
    Likes Received:
    150
    Ratings:
    +192 / 2 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    365ß
    Yeah when Capers put the 3-4 in at G.B. and they won the superbowl it was a "me too" craze for awhile.
    But then G.B. defense sucked after that and it seems the switch is back to 4-3.
    • Like Like x 3
  5. A-11

    A-11 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    70
    Ratings:
    +74 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3-4 or 4-3, There is good and bad with both. I think the advantage is in having the one that is used less in your division.

    I actually like the hybrid mix, especially if you have the extremely versatile players that allow you switch around without having the personnel substitutions to key on.

    A lot of Elephants. It's fun to watch the amoebae create uncertainty.

    The Bears would need a NT the most, imo.
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff Yes, in the woods. Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,620
    Likes Received:
    971
    Ratings:
    +1,138 / 3 / -2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    497ß
    It's all cyclical. The read option is nothing but a new name for the triple option, regurgitated from the college ranks. I knew they'd come back to 4-3 at some point.
    • Like Like x 2
  7. lklrlolnlilklsox

    lklrlolnlilklsox Position Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    6,592
    Likes Received:
    268
    Ratings:
    +311 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    59ß
    I'm believer in the 4-3, but I'm a bigger believer in flexibility and creating as much chaos and confusion for today's aerial attacks as humanly possible. That means being eclectic schemers and having a versatile depth chart.
    • Like Like x 5
  8. Mr. Deliverance

    Mr. Deliverance Guest

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    Ratings:
    +109 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    I prefer a 4-3 because the 4-3 Cover 2 CHI runs requires a 3technique DT that can rush the passer and 2 DEs that can do so as well. Then you need 3 LBs that shorten the field for your DBs.

    Its so much easier to draft for a 3-4 defense. We need to wize up and go the way of the 3-4. Its time to stop being so nostalgic and time to start evolving with the times. LBs are more athletic than ever before. I'm all for a 3-4 move.
  9. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    46,433
    Likes Received:
    1,696
    Ratings:
    +1,907 / 6 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    921ß
    So..... you prefer a 4-3, but think the Bears need to wise up and go 3-4?
  10. Mr. Deliverance

    Mr. Deliverance Guest

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    Ratings:
    +109 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    LOL Meant to post I prefer a 3-4.
  11. Nakoma1

    Nakoma1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    183
    Ratings:
    +183 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
  12. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Coordinator SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    9,107
    Likes Received:
    2,101
    Ratings:
    +2,402 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    819ß
    Bradd Biggs:

    Don't we already have enough holes to fill on this team, with limited draft picks and minimal cap space? Why on earth would we make a change like this now? Emery isn't stupid. He wants to leverage the resources we have, and build upon a good foundation, rather than starting over. Every single draft pick next year will be precious - just filing the REAL needs we already have. Why shoot ourselves in the foot by completely gutting our defense?

    Also, some teams are switching BACK to a 4-3 in recent years. So it's not the "magic bullet" people think it is. I think some fans just like "change" for the sake of change.
    • Like Like x 1
  13. DaTreeBears

    DaTreeBears Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    568
    Ratings:
    +672 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    361ß
    Damn it you stole my joke I had planned here. :10_5_135[1]:
  14. Nakoma1

    Nakoma1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    893
    Likes Received:
    183
    Ratings:
    +183 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    If they keep playing the way they have been,... they can start fillings holes by fillings Tucker's first ,..I hoping to see some real improvement this week
  15. JPosh2012

    JPosh2012 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    77
    Ratings:
    +86 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    If I ran the joint (which I don't) I would stay with the 4-3 personally.
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Bearstuff

    Bearstuff Yes, in the woods. Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Messages:
    29,620
    Likes Received:
    971
    Ratings:
    +1,138 / 3 / -2
    ßearz ßuckz:
    497ß
    So you think that the GM/Scouting Department can't find players that fit the scheme? I know, I know, there are only a few hundered defensive players available from college each year. Statistically, we'll never be able to do that job. Again.

Share This Page