Trestman explains why he didn't call any timeouts

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Henry Burris, Nov 19, 2013.

  1. Henry Burris

    Henry Burris Head Coach

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    19,899
    Likes Received:
    2,489
    Ratings:
    +2,766 / 8 / -10
    ßearz ßuckz:
    892ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Trestman discusses decision to not call timeouts late in game
    Monday, November 18, 2013 2:42 p.m. CST
    LAKE FOREST — When Ray Rice ran 11 yards for a first down to the Bears’ five-yard line in the final minute on Sunday, it seemed fair to wonder if Marc Trestman would call any timeouts.

    The Ravens were five yards away from a go-ahead touchdown, the Bears had all three timeouts left and could save some clock for Josh McCown. Or, if the Ravens got a field goal, they could have some time to try and win.

    I asked Trestman about the situation, and he explained his thought process, and how analytics and the Ravens’ playbook went into his decision to let the clock run down.

    “I think it’s a very fair question. But let me just give you a big picture. When you call timeouts at the end of halves, you want to call them in succession if you can. If you’re calling them just hit or miss, there’s really no value on that.

    “So just a little bit of history, when you start a drive from the 16-yard line, you have a 13 percent chance probably in the last five years to score a touchdown. And you have to take that into consideration when you go into the game. And then when a team’s driving, you need to know what they have and you need to know that you have.

    “They had two timeouts at the time, and we had three timeouts. Well, the normal thinking is you never want to leave a game with your three timeouts. You want to get them back, especially in those situations. But the fact of the matter is that there was really no time to use the timeouts. And when you’re in a two-minute situation and if you use your timeouts and there’s no way you can call them in succession, you give them more time on each and every play to get the people out there that they want to complete that, to get that play done. So you have to consider that.

    “Really, only the first time where I considered really calling a timeout was after Ray Rice had the 11-yard run down to the five-yard line. And he took that ball with, I think it was about 1:16 when he had that ball. That was the first time. I was down there with the official. That was the first time. But when you put it all together, the numbers all together, if you call three timeouts right there in succession, you’re still only getting the ball back at 18 seconds. OK? If you let it run, they’re in a two-minute mode and now they’ve got to call two timeouts.

    “A couple things come into play with them using their two timeouts. Number one, they didn’t call a timeout on the first one which means they had to call a play out of their two-minute package instead of using their red-zone package. So that’s number one. They didn’t call a timeout and get into different personnel groupings. They called a play. And then by using their two timeouts, we knew what they had to do on third down. They had to throw it, because there wasn’t enough time left to do anything else. So we cut the percentages in half of run to pass and then it was just one big leap of faith.

    “If we had called three timeouts in a row, we’ve got 19, 18 seconds left at the max. So, the percentage of them scoring … It’s a leap of faith. They went all the way down the field. Three points yes, tied the game. Seven points? We’re talking 13 percent. And then from an offensive standpoint as a play-caller, I know if you call timeout, you get what you want out there. If not, you’ve got a limited bag of plays you can use. So that’s the reasoning behind it. I would have loved to have been able to have a situation when they were running the ball and they started to get into that field goal area, where we could have plugged the timeouts, each one on top of each other. But that wasn’t the case.”



    I know a lot of you are going to say "that was still a stupid decision", and that's I'm happy for you, but Trestman played this VERY calmly and logically, reacting accordingly to how the Ravens were calling their plays, and it turned out, he made the right decision.
     
    #1
    • Like Like x 7
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß
    Henry, lets see if you and I are the only ones who listened to his presser today all the way to the end where he explained it. Smart move. He forced Baltimore to use theirs and then they had to stick with their two minute offense and weren't able to get into a goal line offense which may have saved the TD. Good thread!

    This game was won partly because he outcoached John Harbaugh and that's not easy to do. When was the last game we won in the Lovie era where we outcoached the other guys at crunch time. Usually it was just the opposite.
     
    #2
    • Like Like x 7
  3. Loki

    Loki Assault Admin
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    23,942
    Likes Received:
    3,778
    Ratings:
    +4,158 / 18 / -9
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,346ß
    A Soul sighting! Call the press!!!
     
    #3
  4. a_miljan

    a_miljan Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    415
    Ratings:
    +529 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    604ß
    Soul is back the day after I revealed he is actually 54. Coincidence? I think not!
     
    #4
    • Like Like x 3
  5. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    3,646
    Ratings:
    +4,437 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,924ß
    It's messed up but ya it was the right call. 13% chance of scoring a td from 16, and didn't allow them to substitute, which forced them to use their timeouts which meant they had none when it was time for their last shot at a TD.

    Could you imagine how that question would have been answered if Lovie or one of his OC's had tried to answer it? Ugh, instead we learn something from our HC, nice change of pace.
     
    #5
    • Like Like x 1
  6. mdbearz

    mdbearz Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    360
    Ratings:
    +418 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    221ß
    I hate to say it, but Marc Trestman is smarter than I am.

    If the Ravens get into the "Heavy-Goalline package" There is no way in hell we stop them from scoring.

    Ok so far I have been impressed with T-man, but this is borderline football genius.

    Coach of the Year discussions if we can get into the playoffs?
     
    #6
  7. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    3,646
    Ratings:
    +4,437 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,924ß
    Coach the year might well goto Chico, but Testy should be talked about.
     
    #7
  8. mdbearz

    mdbearz Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    360
    Ratings:
    +418 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    221ß
    Do you think the no-flag last night tarnished the win?

    BTW- I know that Carolina winning last night could have hurt the Bears, but I could not help but root for them.
     
    #8
  9. billatter

    billatter Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    288
    Ratings:
    +357 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    222ß
    Nope, I like seeing the Patsies with their knickers all in a bunch.
     
    #9
    • Like Like x 1
  10. WarLax

    WarLax Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2013
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    43
    Ratings:
    +59 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    35ß
    I much prefer this message board, but given the relative lack of activity I tend towards that other "big" Chicago MB *on gamedays*. The meatballs on there screaming about timeouts during/after the game were and still are ridiculous and as such, this thread makes me happy. Not that it will keep them from calling Trestman names and calling for his ouster, but it does show that he is just so much smarter than they are.

    Long live the Trest!
     
    #10
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.