Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement! There could be SO many things going on. He could have chewed on Webb in private, he may be a good enough people evaluator to have decided that the best way to motivate Webb might be to let him know he has to win the job and yet not to crush him in public.... We simply don't know wha has happened in private or how Webb handles adversity (or Trestman either for that matter). I just think the whole thing is a non issue. Obviously Trestman is not happy and something has been said. If the guy thinks he is a better coach than Trestman, tat's fine. He called him out in public. Now, all he has to do is convince one of 32 owners that he can handle the situation better than Trestman. Otherwise, maybe an opinion without trashing someone might be the best approach. For me, this is not about protecting Trestman... It's about some douche attaching a guys management style in public when he probably does not have all the facts nor anywhere near the credentials to do it better. I hate guys that can do it better when all they have is a pen in their hand.