Tucker did it!!!

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by Bearsinhouston, Nov 24, 2013.

  1. DaTreeBears

    DaTreeBears Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,252
    Likes Received:
    670
    ßearz ßuckz:
    587ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    They are just a bunch of mother Tucker's playing D, I wish we could have a bunch of mean mother f's...
     
  2. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,041
    Likes Received:
    2,592
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,342ß
    Well..... The defense is on fire.... but not in a good way
     
  3. irishways

    irishways Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    3,374
    Likes Received:
    550
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,833ß
    This is the worst defense I can ever remember for our beloved Bears. Tucker needs to be fired. Sorry, injuries happen and yes, I'm sure it hasn't helped. That said, the D was bad from the start of the season, before the injuries mounted. The safety's that looked to be the future last year, look to be replaced next year. These players are always out of position. that falls on the coach.
     
  4. butka

    butka Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2013
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    122
    ßearz ßuckz:
    21ß
    I'm kind of surprised by how many people are putting such a strong amount of blame on Tucker here. This regression could be seen a mile away. Years of crappy drafts created a dearth of talent on both sides of the ball. Management decided to spend the resources to fix the offense and hope the D had one more run left. To me, that was the best gamble too. Well, guess what, the defense is old and worn out and the crap shoot was lost. Now, they have to fix the D. Does anyone remember what happened to this defense after the Super Bowl appearance and before Julius Peppers got here? The defense was poor with no pass rush. Our 3rd down D was absolute crap. You can trace the re-emergence of the D to Julius Peppers' arrival. Well, now he's showing his age and not getting the pressure he once did. He's not requiring a constant double team and the occasional triple team. This D lived and died by Julius Peppers' ability to raise hell in the pocket. Couple that with the injuries to the older veterans and this disaster should be no surprise. I just don't know how so much blame can be placed on the DC. He came in and try to make everything the same for this guys. Kept the same calls, nomenclature, everything. I'm sure they felt this was the best way to keep things the same and to keep the Lovie disciples happy. I think we need to see what Tucker can do with his own D. Sure, the gap integrity and mental mistakes could be coaching issues. But if you think this group isn't severely lacking talent and the coaching should receive the majority of the blame, I'll have to disagree. In what universe is starting Zach Bowman, Landon Cohen, rookie Khaseem Greene, and Corey Wooton at the 3 technique going to yield a good result? I'm not even going to get into the other guys.

    I think most went into the pre-season with the thought that a rebuild was needed on D. I think the good start from the offense gave everyone hope that we could go somewhere this season and the negativity disappeared. It's becoming apparent that the defense fell off the cliff and rebuilding it will be the main focus along with adding one or two more parts to the O. The good news is, defenses can be turned around quickly in the NFL. The bad news is, we don't have young horses at the priciest spots... pass rushers and corner.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    4,115
    Likes Received:
    696
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,706ß
    When you are 32nd in rush defense and every OC in the league is targeting McClellin and running over him and around Conte, the Bears have NOTHING LEFT TO LOSE by making changes. I can't resist. I have to say it one more time and then you can tell me "coaches know best" one more time...

    Play CornWash, damn it!

    He can bench press McClellin 15 times.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,703
    Likes Received:
    4,029
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,752ß
    1. I believe this defense has quit on Tucker.
    2. I believe that there is a stench that can stick to a defense, after epic losing that can be a cancer moving forward. I'd like to see a new DC. Clean start with the new players next year.
    3. I totally agree we've had a lot of injuries. Hey, it's the NFL and it's a way of life. But it's not just the injuries alone. We have young players, healthy, who still play like crap.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. A-11

    A-11 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    219
    Likes Received:
    70
    ßearz ßuckz:
    [(x)Bear's D]/Burnt = [(y)Tucker]/ Fired


    JABF99's factors also hold true:
    3 > (1+2) in the instance above.

    It is no co-incidence I agree with both of you. Butka brings up a good points, and I recall an article not to long ago that supported Mel because of the regression, injuries, and holding to the plan of keeping the terminology of Lovie's D for the Veterans. It might not be fair, but I hear the internet ghosts whispering, "Just win baby."

    This is not Lovie's Defense. The back bone is broken. No pressure... no workie. We also found out the Safety Valve is broken.

    When "X" is 145.2 yards per game for rushing yards against the Bear's D, I see "Y" Mel Tucker should be fired. Make sense to me.
    It could be an error, I'm not mad if Tucker gets another year because of all the variables, but I would try something else if given a choice.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  8. ChiCityBears

    ChiCityBears Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    19
    ßearz ßuckz:
    Our O is rated 8th now.
     
  9. 4dabers

    4dabers Pro-Bowler
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,200
    Likes Received:
    978
    ßearz ßuckz:
    612ß
    Wow, I've been looking on some other boards and everyone is ready to get rid of Tucker. This board is much more realistic, reasonable and mature, so the "blame Tucker" crowd is more rational, but I just don't see it. Yea, he has made some bad calls, but the overwhelming majority of the problem lies with personnel and the biggest reason we are seeing the personnel that we are is because of injuries. Yes, injuries happen, but when they start to mount it becomes damn near impossible to overcome regardless of who's coaching them. It's one thing to overcome one or two, even three starters, but good god almost 1/2 of our starting Defense are reserves, and in some cases, reserves of reserves. When Linebackers start to try to cover for a decimated D-Line, the linebackers start to look poor, and our linebackers are green as gourds. When the linebackers start to play poorly, then the safetys and DB's have to play better and we are already playing without Peanut, so our Safetys look worse than they are. This is a team game guys and it takes the whole 11 man squad to play well; if 5 guys screw up their assignment, the other 6 often look bad too because they are trying to compensate and play above their responsibilities.

    Yes, we need better talent, and yes, I would like to see Tucker do better with what he has, but frankly Wootten shouldn't be playing DT, but he has to because of injuries; McClellin shouldn't be playing DE as often as he is, but he has to because Wooten is playing DE; both safteys are looking bad, but our rookie MLB can't cover the deep middle and he's playing at MLB now, because of injuries; Bowman shouldn't be playing at CB as a starter, but he has to because of injuries; Greene shouldn't be playing the Will spot yet, but he has too because of injuries; Anderson should not be calling the Defense in his first year here, but he has to because of injuries. We have an undrafted rookie that we picked up from the RAIDERS practice squad playing part time DE because of injuries. I never even heard of this Cohen guy that's playing DT, but he's playing because of injuries.

    I don't really know enough about Tucker to know if he sucks or not. I know I don't like what I'm seeing, but if the guy was able to make a solid Defense out of this group he would be in line for Coordinator of the year. To blame him for this disaster at this point is a bit unfair in my opinion. I'm not trying to take up for him because I just don't know, but for the same reason, I'm not ready to throw him under the bus either.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  10. shark86x

    shark86x Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    871
    ßearz ßuckz:
    868ß
    We're normally on the same page, 4DaBears, but I have to say that I am one of those that want Tucker fired. For a while I was giving him the benefit of the injury card. But he ran a bottom of the league D in jacksonville. Gave up a lot of yards and a lot of points. He's doing the same here. I understand the injury issues, but fact is we were playing badly BEFORE the injuries started. Now we have next man up several times over, but why is everybody always out of position? why is everybody running band angles? why is everybody tackling badly? With so many repeat performances, it's not just the players. It falls on coaching. I blame Tucker.
     

Share This Page