Week 4: Bears lose. Who gets the deflated football?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by The Benjamin, Sep 29, 2013.

?

Who gets the deflated football?

  1. Mark Trestman

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Jay Cutler

    21 vote(s)
    53.8%
  3. The Defense

    1 vote(s)
    2.6%
  4. The whole F'n team

    15 vote(s)
    38.5%
  5. Other

    2 vote(s)
    5.1%
  1. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,991
    Likes Received:
    4,125
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,060ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    We all understood that the defense would not get the attention of the past, once we went with an offensive minded head coach. The problem is that the offense is still the Achilles heal in big games with Cutler as our QB. The game today, even with the defensive problems, was winable, but Cutler gave the game to Detroit with the turnovers, under/over throws & basically wetting himself.
     
  2. Bearcity78

    Bearcity78 Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2013
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    I hear Ya, he did look like the Cutler we are all use to seeing but there just isn't a better option out there and I still think its worth a try to see what Mark Trestman the so called Quarter back whisperer can do with him. After all we gave up alot to get him and its not like he has been in the same system for four years.
     
  3. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,421
    Likes Received:
    2,692
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,731ß

    Yeah Ric. We'll have to respectfully disagree on this one. If as you say "The DL w/Peppers, Melton, Paea, and Wooton and Shea should STILL be able to get get pressure" and they are not, I DO think that when their coach has changed, it then certainly becomes a prime candidate for suspicion. If you don't see it that way, I respect it, but I just don't see it the same way.

    Emery is going to have to earn his money this off season again. Is he going to get us Shea #2 or Long #2?
     
  4. phatdude

    phatdude Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    82
    ßearz ßuckz:
    111ß
    I agree with this.

    I know I'm the newb here, but I was surprised to see a lot of folks calling for Cutlers head after one loss. Even a couple wanted Trestman fired (luckily no one voted for that).

    Jay made some mistakes, and it added to the loss. He also was "Mr. 4th Quarter" in the games we did WIN this season so far. The bigger question is can Trestman work with him after the loss? Will he truly be "old Jay" or was it just an off night? I hope they can figure it out.

    My bigger worry is the D... They make some awesome plays every now and then. Game WINNING plays. HOWEVER it seems that their defense FUNDAMENTALS are not there. Basic things like tackling are not there. Obviously holes in the D to allow runs. No pass defense. All basics that are missing. I said from the beginning that I think we underestimated the loss of Lovie, Marinelli and Urlacher and their impact on our defense. I think we are starting to see it.

    Lets also not forget "luck". Any given Sunday... There was plenty of fumbles but Detroit lucked out and recovered. Even the ball bounces were against us.

    Anyhow, that's my take on it. It's still too early to condemn Jay or Trestman, however the defense should be looked at right away..
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,591
    Likes Received:
    3,973
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,865ß
    I'd like to point out that, in my world, if you are the qb that was the reason for the team falling behind, then you don't get credit for bringing the team back, and in the Cincy game he was the reason for them being behind. So lets slow the role on "mr 4th qtr".

    BiH, I want to see what Tucker can do running his system w/his plays and not trying to use Lovie's playbook. I was against that from the get go b/c I didn't like the D being so turn over dependent. But to appease the D players he went with it; now the players cannot execute and I just don't buy that it's the coaches fault. Tucker gets a bye imo until he gets to run his system and not Lovie's; but if the D is a complete fail, and they decide to move on I'll not be upset w/that either.
     
  6. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,421
    Likes Received:
    2,692
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,731ß
    I don't want to back and forth forever Ric -- I'm more than ok with our differences. I respect your thoughts on it. My thing is, wouldn't Tuckers plays have been even worse for a group that was used to a certain playbook and excelled under it? I mean, same guys, same plays... seems like a coaches dream to take over a top D and keep the players and the scheme. Seems like as much of a sure thing as possible.

    I understand where you are coming from ( A guy should be judged on his own D not someone elses --- but I would also say a guy can and should be judged on the ability to take a top D, keep the players, keep the scheme and not have the bottom fall out), but don't get why you think that strategy would be as productive as keeping the old top D strategy. Even if Tuckers D would have been an even better D than we had before, I'm thinking that it would have taken a while to get to the level it needed to be to actually be better.

    Anyway.... That's my thinking on it.
     
  7. Mr. Deliverance

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    ßearz ßuckz:
    They pulled out the Bengals game at the last moment. I wouldn't be too proud of that, considering he simply didn't play with any consistency in that game.

    And let's talk about that MIN game. Game was closer than it should of been because of how careless Cutler was with the ball, when Allen sacked him and it was run back for 6. Instead of us cruising to victory he made it a nail biter when it shouldn't have been. These are not wins that anyone should be hailing Cutler for. But its typical. Give Cutler all the credit for those 2 wins, when in reality he made them closer than they should have been because of his play and poor handling of the ball.
     
  8. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,275
    Likes Received:
    1,695
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,336ß
    I'd like to point out that Jay Cutler soils himself inexcusably in key games for long stretches and that's the reason we lost. And that's the reason he hasn't proven himself worthy of a new contract.
     
  9. DavidL

    DavidL Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    4,203
    Likes Received:
    718
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,795ß
    I would like to point out that all of us OLD BEARS FANS (guys over age 60) have SUFFERED for FOUR DECADES with QB's who couldn't play HALF as well as Cutler. And I DID vote the deflated football to Cutler today.

    I would also like to point out that the NFL draft is no panacea. Rex Grossman and Cade McClown were high draft picks. How did that work out? So let's not throw Cutler under the bus until we are prepared to do serious suffering with whatever replaces him.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Hall of Famer

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    5,275
    Likes Received:
    1,695
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,336ß
    I remember plenty of terrible Bears QBs too dating back to Bullet Bob Avellini in the 70s. Cutler is the most physically gifted one we have had in my lifetime which makes it all the more frustrating when he goes mentally off the reservation and reverts back to the same bad habits that Trestman is desperately trying to coach out of him. The bottom line is that this is the "decision year" on Cutler as far as a future contract goes and he definitely hurt his case today. Not because we lost but because he was overwhelmingly responsible for the loss. Matt Ryan lost today too and he certainly left some plays on the field but he didn't beat his own team by wetting himself with obvious misses, mental lapses, and 4 turnovers.
     

Share This Page