Week to go Mock

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by riczaj01, May 2, 2014.

  1. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,886
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,143ß
    Ratings:
    +4,553 / 10 / -8
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Okay so I wasn't planning on doing another one, but Emery's presser solidified somethings, IF they are to be believed:
    1) Ratty/Houston are in the DT rotation, along w/Collins that's 3 guys
    2) They've changed their strategy of scouting looking for bigger=better
    3) S is VERY thin, there are the first 2(people assume Dix/Pryor but he didn't say that) and then there is a significant drop after that, to the point that they are looking for a CB to convert to S.
    4) He's not planning on drafting a qb after the 3rd round, not that he won't, but not after the 3rd.
    5) He's narrowed the first round to 6 players, and will be happy if 2 or 3 are still there.
    6) Emery either sees no chance of Donald being there, or isn't interested in him b/c he doesn't fit the Bigger=Better mold, again this is assuming the presser wasn't a ton of blown smoke.
    7) Only one LB has been given assurance they have a starting job, Briggs and he's hurt.
    Also, not pat of the presser,
    There is a theory they want a legit backup rb, lets assume that's correct also, we'll replace that w/the TE need b/c of the signing of Mulligan
    Looking at back his drafts, guys w/"versatility" he's drafted:
    Shea, DE/OLB first round
    Hardin C/S(in their evaluation) 3rd round
    E-Rod TE/H-Back 4th round
    Long G/T 1st round
    Bostic ILB/OLB 2nd round
    Corny Wash DE/OLB 6th round
    The only outliers early were Jeffery(WR), Greene(who was always considered OLB). Emery is in fact a fan of versatility, for better or worse.

    I'm not going to do a write up, I think we all know these players by now:

    14 Here's my best guess at the 6 guys they think my be there in no paticular order: Pryor/Dix/Donald/Hagemen/Gilbert/Mosely
    If he thinks only 2 or 3 are going to be there, then I'm guessing he thinks those 3 will be Pryor/Hagemen/Mosely
    He said there is a big drop off between the top 2 S's and the rest of the S's, but he loves versatility which Hagemen/Mosely fit better to his style. At the end of the day I think he goes Pryor S, but it wouldn't surprise me if he went w/the other 2. Pryor imo is 1 of the 2 S's Emery talks about and will be a surefire day 1 starter.

    51 Keith McGill CB, here is a big 6'3" guy that could convert to S, at least for 1 year before he gets his shot to start at CB whenTillman retires.

    82 Tom Savage QB, he's a big guy at 6'4" 228lbs w/a good arm and good pocket pressence. If Emery wants a qb that can come in and compete for the backup job w/Palmer(btw Palmer hails from the late rounds tht didn't develop any starters that Emery pointed out) then Savage might be his guy. He ran a pro style O in college completing over 60% of his passes

    117 Carium Ried DT 6'2 302, it was reported the Bears showed real interest in Ried, Emery also said the new staff/scouting equate to bigger=better. Ried had a good senior bowl and combine showing quickness for someone his size, and the ability to beat player linemen w/power. A lot of teams are showing interest and have him at a 2nd day grade. I can see them using him at DT and NT next to Rattliff and Houston or in replacement of them.

    156 Lorenzo Taliafarra RB, 6'0" 229 lb, ran a 4.58, averaging over 6.0+ ypc his senior year and showed the ability to pick up blitzes at the senior bowl, he also has the ability to catch out of the backfield.

    183 Bruce Gaston DT 6'2" 303 another big physical guy that can get behind the line and cause havoc, he's better at controlling his gap and stopping the run, so I could see the team looking at him as more of a NT along w/Paea.

    191 Pat O'Donnell P, speaking of positions that have sucked for years, that the Bears need to shore up, O'Donnell has a big leg averaging over 47ypp w/a long of 71.
     
    #1
    • Like Like x 2
  2. little bear

    little bear Assistant Head Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    14,729
    Likes Received:
    1,712
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,623ß
    Ratings:
    +2,091 / 3 / -6
    Excellent choice, bro. I love it. :thumb:
     
    #2
  3. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,684
    Likes Received:
    1,643
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,841ß
    Ratings:
    +2,233 / 1 / -0
    Pretty good...I like it...except I don't think they're drafting a punter. Just some inside knowledge I may or may not have. I could be wrong.
     
    #3
  4. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,886
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,143ß
    Ratings:
    +4,553 / 10 / -8
    roster:

    Cutler/Palmer/Savage
    Forte/Taliafarra/Ford
    Fiametta
    Bennett/Mulligan/Rosario/Fendi
    Marshal/Jeffery/Wilson/Weems/Hixon/Tolliver
    Bushrod/Mills/JLong/Britton/Gaines
    Slauson/Long/DeLaPuenta/Brown/Boggs
    Garza/DeLaPuenta/Boggs

    Ratliff/Collins/Houston/Ried
    Paea/Ratliff/Gaston
    Allen/Houston/Young/Bass/CornyWash
    Briggs/Shea/Greene/Bostic
    Williams/Bostic
    Jennings/Tillman/Frey/McGill/Hurst
    Conte/Pryor/Mundy/Steltz/Manning/McGill
     
    #4
  5. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,886
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,143ß
    Ratings:
    +4,553 / 10 / -8
    I don't think they'll draft a punter either, but the reality is that a 6th rounder is a flyer no matter what, and he's probably one of the best punters in the draft...and I wanted to go a little out of the box.
     
    #5
  6. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    1,574
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,052ß
    Ratings:
    +1,963 / 2 / -0
    Pretty reasonable assessment, again assuming Emery is telling it straight and not blowing smoke yesterday.

    I'm not sure who Phil is so confident of to take Donald ahead of us. NYG? Detroit? Someone trading up ahead? But he was pretty clear (as much as one can be reading between the lines) that he isn't planning on AD being there, isn't interested in him, or is doing a masterful job of disguising his interest.

    My best guess is that Pryor is his #1 realistic target. If Dix and Pryor are both gone, I'm gonna guess he tries to swing a small trade down to net an extra 3rd-4th and then takes Hageman. Then you would have some extra ammo to move up in the 2nd to get Ward. For some reason Hageman SCREAMS EMERY-PICK to me in the mold of KLong last year.

    If Phil is being upfront about his QB plans (top 3 rounds or not at all) then I don't want to draft one at all this year. We have way too many D needs now and in the near future to use a 2nd or 3rd round pick on a luxury. We need DT, S, CB, and LB help/depth and let's face it like it or not Jay Cutler wasn't paid $54m to be anything but the STARTER the next 3 years. It's his job sink or swim at least 3 more seasons barring major injury.
     
    #6
  7. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,886
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,143ß
    Ratings:
    +4,553 / 10 / -8
    MP, I personally think TB will take Donald, Donald is the prototypical Lovie 2 DT.

    Hagement/Tuitt are the guys that really just jump off the page at me as Emery guys, if he were to drop back, Im guessing those would be his targets, it's not like Emery would care that Tuitt is a early 2 round grade either.

    I don't consider backup qb a luxury pick; not when Cutler missing 2-3 games every year, it feels like that anyways. And Palmer doesn't fit the bill for what Emery described either, if McCown was still here, a 3rd round drafted guy I wouldn't have taken a QB either. But if Emery is really a stat guy like he claims, then Palmer isn't his backup either so I ran with it, I don't think it will happen either though. I don't think Savage is capable of stealing the starting role, but I do think he'd fill in as backup better the Palmer.
     
    #7
  8. butkus3595

    butkus3595 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,684
    Likes Received:
    1,643
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,841ß
    Ratings:
    +2,233 / 1 / -0
    Hearing some teams want Ealy to put on 15 pounds and play DT. Hmmmmmm......
     
    #8
  9. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,886
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,143ß
    Ratings:
    +4,553 / 10 / -8
    Does that sound like an Emery guy? DT/DE instead of DE/OLB? He's 6'4" 273 right now Unlike Shea, putting 15 lbs on would put him at 290. Still seems a bit small, and sounds like he's a really refined DE using more speed then power. But it would definately not surprise me.
     
    #9
  10. MPbears68

    MPbears68 Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    1,574
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,052ß
    Ratings:
    +1,963 / 2 / -0
    Donald is a PERFECT FIT in Tampa I agree but they already have one of the best 3Ts in the NFL. And they need OFFENSE way more than defense.

    I agree that Hageman (maybe Tuitt too, I just don't know him as well and I think he's had an injury) seem like "Emery guys" on the surface due to versatility and upside. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if RH is the guy somewhere in the 1st.

    But if it's "top 3 rounds only" I can't justify taking a QB this year. We don't need to "develop a starter". I know you hate Cutler but face it his contract says he's the guy for at least 3 years. We would be looking for a #3/#2 guy only at this point. The time to draft a successor is still a year or two away. And we really need those 1st-3rd round picks this year for defense,
     
    #10

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.