What happened to our playmakers on defense? Is this coaching or talent?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Aug 16, 2014.

?

What is wrong with this D?

  1. Bad coaching or scheme.

    12 vote(s)
    63.2%
  2. Bad players.

    1 vote(s)
    5.3%
  3. Nothing is wrong. We're just as good as those teams like Seattle.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. It's just "preseason" and those other teams like Seattle are just better preseason teams.

    2 vote(s)
    10.5%
  5. Other (let us know what you think is wrong)

    4 vote(s)
    21.1%
  1. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,281
    Likes Received:
    3,855
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,304ß
    Ratings:
    +4,615 / 4 / -1
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I've been watching a lot of preseason football (not just Bears but the other teams in the NFL). It seems to give me a better feel for where our team is at right now on D. It gives perspective. I'm beginning to wonder what happened with our Chicago Bears defense.

    I turned the TV off last night after watching the Seattle game and was walking back to go to bed when it hit me as to what's happened to the Bears.

    When I watch the other NFL teams this preseason - the ones with the better defenses - there is a night and day difference between THOSE teams D and what Tucker has out there now. Those better D's are alpha dog mentality teams that attack the offenses and impose their will on them. They are aggressive and just maul offenses. They look like they have a "sense of purpose" out there, rather than playing on their heels. Soul has described in several posts here in recent weeks about how the Bears D players look tentative (sometimes clueless). The solid NFL defenses this preseason - they are "downhill" teams that put the wood to offenses mano a mano stuff. They clearly KNOW where they are to be and THEY MAKE PLAYS on a consistent basis.

    Us?

    We are looking lost out there. On our heals "reacting" rather than aggressively making plays. I guess THAT is what the Bears D is missing. Where are the playmakers? Sure, you see a couple of isolated "good plays" in these games. But watch the better D's perform this preseason and there are aggressive playmakers flying EVERYWHERE. The kind of thing you used to see the Bears do in past seasons when we had a good defense. Now? You just see players out of position. On their heals. Shea gives that "deer in the headlights" look and wanders back for the next play - looking defeated. Others aren't looking any better to me.

    I think we're a screwed goose this season if Tucker can't get a better performance from these guys. I'm thinking 8-8 season again and no playoffs. I think that's the ceiling with this bunch on D. Rodgers, and even Detroit will rip us good with this D. Same with any of the other good teams that can gut a defense.

    Now, please feel free to cue up the "overreacting" comments and the "this is just preseason, and the sky is not falling" comments. But I tell 'ya in advance, WATCH the better D's this preseason and tell my why they are not playing so tentative, lost, reactive & with an "on their heels" mentality? Why are THEIR players flying around aggressively making plays - while we're not?
     
    #1
  2. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    1,093
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,555ß
    Ratings:
    +1,468 / 4 / -0
    I tend to think it is the LB's.

    The line, CB's and even the Safeties seem to be holding up. We got spoiled with great MLB's and now we do not have one. If Bostic made every play like the one he tackled Gerhardt in the backfield we would feel we were attacking I believe. We went many years with strong LB play with Briggs and Urlacher and now Briggs is older and Urlacher is retired. The D line and CB's will be fine if they can master the peddy interference calls being highlighted in the pre-season.

    Downhill attack needs to come from the LB's behind the line and I believe this is what we are lacking so far. I too have been watching several other games and based on what I have seen put us in the middle of the road so far.
     
    #2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. billatter

    billatter Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    289
    ßearz ßuckz:
    223ß
    Ratings:
    +359 / 0 / -0
    Flying around, making plays requires confidence in the guys next to you. Flying around implies risk of missing and you need others to clean up your miss. If you doubt their performance, you'll be cautious in yours. It also requires coaches who are tolerant of risk takers, recognizing that risk implies failure some of the time. It also requires a willingness to let players learn from mistakes, rather than impose systems that constrain them to minimize mistakes. Think "playing like bureaucrats."

    Whether any of this applies to the Bears, I don't know as I'm not sitting in their meetings, but if it does, our Mr. Tucker will have a short tenure.
     
    #3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Bear_40

    Bear_40 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    81
    ßearz ßuckz:
    221ß
    Ratings:
    +119 / 1 / -0
    I can agree to an extent with the LB's being an issue, but I'm not convinced we have the right guy coaching the D. After last seasons debacle and from what I've seen so far, I'm not impressed. We have aggressive players, it just seems like we're playing not to lose instead of attacking and playing to win. This is a coaching and scheme issue.
     
    #4
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3,296
    Likes Received:
    1,093
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,555ß
    Ratings:
    +1,468 / 4 / -0
    You may be right but I am holding judgement on Tucker. Last year he had no healthy talent and this year its just way to early in the preseason. Hoping Tucker has what it takes so we do not have to keep rebuilding this thing and new schemes. Seen that with the offense for years and it just did not turn out to well prior to Trestman arriving
     
    #5
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    12,281
    Likes Received:
    3,855
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,304ß
    Ratings:
    +4,615 / 4 / -1
    The next preseason game (with Seattle) will give us a good measuring stick opportunity to see where we are at as a team. I'm not giving up on the D but rather disappointed with what we're seeing up to this point. I think we have the talent to be a solid defense. I just don't see the unit coming together yet. We look so vulnerable and tentative so far. Any idiot can see that the better offenses are going to feast on this D if it doesn't improve for the regular season.

    The bottom-line is that the offense alone won't put us past teams like Green Bay and Detroit (and the other good offenses that we will meet this year) unless the D can slow them down - just enough - that our offense can score more points than theirs. It's basic math. Right now I think we'd get buried by the better teams and Cutler's arm (alone) isn't going to surmount this. We need a better D and until we have that we won't be division champions, much less be Super Bowl champs. Watch Seattle next week against the Bears (their 1's against our 1's) and we'll measure where we're at as a team. I absolutely LOVE watching that Seattle D. That's why they are champs.
     
    #6
  7. tbear1

    tbear1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    276
    ßearz ßuckz:
    377ß
    Ratings:
    +341 / 1 / -0
    JABF, You are not the only one. Like you I have tuned into other games. It is dissapointing to see the limited progress we have made on defense. The fan boys will come up with plenty of excuses. I will start the list of excuses for them.
    1. It's only pre-season and we didn't scout the team.
    2. We are not yet full strength on defense.
    3. This is Tucker's scheme, but not his players. He can only work with what he is given.
    4. It's the LB fault and we have no Safeties to pick from.
    5. The positional coaching is not working.
    6. We are drafting poorly and have no depth.
    7. There is a lack of compettition to get the best out of players.
    8. The natural grass in SF needs to be replaced with artificial turf.
    9. Jerry Angelo
    10. Chris Conte.
    Reserved for future usage: Injuries.

    Like you, I am excited about the season starting. The offense looks solid for the second year running. I hope we can turn around the defensive play or we are in for another Packer's NFC North title.
     
    #7
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2014
    • Bear Down! Bear Down! x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    9,457
    Likes Received:
    2,445
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,749ß
    Ratings:
    +3,588 / 13 / -0
    Don't forget to blame JA
     
    #8
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. BradMustersGhost

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    805
    Likes Received:
    321
    ßearz ßuckz:
    447ß
    Ratings:
    +400 / 1 / -0
    I had my doubts regarding Tucker when he was first hired, as did many of you. Call me pessimistic, but I think that Tucker's ceiling as a DC is pretty low. I just don't have an overabundance of faith in the man at this point in time. I would love for him to prove me wrong, but as things currently stand, I would give my left nut (and Henry's right nut) for one of the Ryan boys to be our DC (since Buddy is too old and in ill health, unfortunately).
     
    #9
    • Bear Down! Bear Down! x 1
  10. tbear1

    tbear1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    276
    ßearz ßuckz:
    377ß
    Ratings:
    +341 / 1 / -0
    Thanks. I fixed it. Too bad we can't keep it updated as the edit feature expires.
     
    #10
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.