What happened to our playmakers on defense? Is this coaching or talent?

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by JustAnotherBearsFan99, Aug 16, 2014.

?

What is wrong with this D?

  1. Bad coaching or scheme.

    12 vote(s)
    63.2%
  2. Bad players.

    1 vote(s)
    5.3%
  3. Nothing is wrong. We're just as good as those teams like Seattle.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. It's just "preseason" and those other teams like Seattle are just better preseason teams.

    2 vote(s)
    10.5%
  5. Other (let us know what you think is wrong)

    4 vote(s)
    21.1%
  1. Ski-Whiz

    Ski-Whiz
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 1996
    Messages:
    37,425
    Likes Received:
    955
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,336ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    its funny because he sucked in Jacksonville. If he defense was so dominating, how come his defensive players got changed out? How come he left Jacksonville? If he was this great coach why didn't he get retained after del Rio got canned?

    he sucked. I don't care about stats. That's paper racing. Did their defense win games like the bears during Lovie?
     
  2. DavidL

    DavidL
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2013
    Messages:
    4,326
    Likes Received:
    737
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,925ß
    I agree with most of this. The Bears averaged 7th best defense in the NFL from 2008-2012, according to your numbers. Match Lovie's defense over that span with the current Bears offense, and we are Super Bowl level team. We have about two more years to get there before this offense starts to lose some key players to FA or age.
     
  3. DaTreeBears

    DaTreeBears
    Expand Collapse
    Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,356
    Likes Received:
    703
    ßearz ßuckz:
    694ß
    I can tell you this about the Bears we have more depth than the pac take that to the bank.
     
  4. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    13,225
    Likes Received:
    4,208
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,301ß
    It's about expectations. Really. Is the expectation set low and we're okay with what we're seeing? Or is the expectation to be a champion again? If the bar is set low then it's all happy talk and we can cue up the excuses and it's all "good" when we lose to Aaron Rodger's Packers and the better teams. We'll get a glimpse of how far we need to improve when we meet Seattle Friday.

    What I'm seeing here are similar excuses like we all trotted out in the Lovie Smith years. Only then the excuses were about the offense. We'd say J'Marcus Webb was improving, Gabe Carimi was going to be okay just give him more time, Chris Williams was going to be okay at the new position, Hester was going to be fine as our #1 wide receiver (didn't he look a bit better last Sunday) and on and on and on. It was always going to be okay because of ______________ just fill in the blank. Only now it's the defense we make excuses for. McClellan is looking better, he'll be okay. It's just preseason. Injuries. Whatever. Just trot out another excuse.

    It's just the defense now instead of the Lovie offense. It's expectation control. Set the bar low enough and we all feel better about sucking for another week.
     
    • Bear Down! Bear Down! x 1
  5. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,878
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,163ß
    Did his Def have players anywhere near on par as Urlacher, Briggs, Tillman, Jennings, Peppers, Harris, Melton, Brown?

    Btw, he did get retained after Del Rio was canned. That was the 1 year he was allowed to call his own def, and it was why he was considered(and still is) an eventual head coach.
     
  6. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    13,225
    Likes Received:
    4,208
    ßearz ßuckz:
    5,301ß
    Sometimes I think it's a "Chicago thing" when we accept mediocrity. As a Cubs and Bears fan I understand the mentality. We can rationalize anything. Dream up excuses for anything. Trot out stats to prove anything. And the years of mediocrity roll on by.

    Now, I'm not wanting to get over-the-top about the defensive woes. Not yet. But I'm also not blindly thinking it's all okay this year on defense. This defense has a long ways to go. Can they be decent? I don't know. I do know I'm gonna be really sad if this D isn't significantly (significantly) better this year. Jay's arm alone isn't going to get us to the promised land. We do need some help from the defense if we expect to be champions - like Seattle. I'm not curious about stats anymore. My own eyes can SEE what we have out there on D.

    Hey, how about dem Cubs?
     
  7. Ski-Whiz

    Ski-Whiz
    Expand Collapse
    George Halas
    Staff Member SuperFan

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 1996
    Messages:
    37,425
    Likes Received:
    955
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,336ß

    Exactly. This is Lovie, but with the defense.

    Funny thing, the Packers won the division with injuries!! So can you blame injuries?

    Everyone wants to look at stats. How about just looking at the film, and take the emotion from that film, and make your decision. I for one am embarrassed at how BAD our defensive side looked last year.

    We have two weeks to put something together, but so far it's the same signs as last year. Big open WRs and wide open holes for RBs.

    If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's certain a duck.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Bearsinhouston

    Bearsinhouston
    Expand Collapse
    Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,666
    Likes Received:
    2,766
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,978ß
    yeah... me too. I think many feel that way, and that has probably been the basis of why there are so many threads on these topics.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,878
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,163ß

    Lovie had close to 10 years of excuses, People in this thread aren't willing to give Tucker 1 and his is legit, and he has a fraction of the say in his personnel. Tucker also had 1 year of one of the worst hit injury bugs of any team losing FAR to many key players to injury to give any real credit for or against and the most he gets is, last year is a N/A, hardly a vote of confidence, unlike what most gave Lovie.

    Emery/Trestman/Tucker/Kromer are having to completely tear down a decades worth of poor drafting and coaching, and yet people expect 2 years in a top 10 O and D and make a run at the Packers who are in the top 1/3 of the league in most years; those are absurd expectations for a new staff. And again, lets not act like Lovie(a D boy) was even giving us top tier D's anymore, so why the hell are we expecting Trestman and his staff to 2 years into their tenure?

    Not one person said Hester was going to be fine as a #1 WR; lets not get brain dead here. Only yaghs are saying Shea is looking better, he's not he's nothing special he's a bust it happens. It is in fact only pre season hate to break the news to you, but it doesn't count, they aren't playing to stop or win, they aren't game planning; especially in the first 2 games of it. Stop acting like the Bears should be on the same page as the Seahags or the 49rs or Balt, they aren't there yet, nor should they be, those teams have a 2-3 year head start.

    Is the expectations 2 years into a HC's reign of a poorly run franchise a SB? Is that your expectation? B/c it's not mine, I expect to see vast improvements in FA, Draft and overall play in the first 2 years. After that I expect to see improvements in the depth of the team and their ability to consistently compete w/the top teams when they face them and make runs in the playoffs year in year out. And imo I think this team could have made that run last year but you don't lose every key starter on 1 side of the ball and make a run in the playoffs, especially when you lose your key starter on the other side to boot. And honestly I cannot see how this team isn't in contention of a playoff spot this year, in all honesty I think this team is a good 2-3 years ahead of schedule, but that shouldn't be the expectation, those are stretch goals.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. riczaj01

    riczaj01
    Expand Collapse
    DaBears Ditka
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    24,878
    Likes Received:
    4,064
    ßearz ßuckz:
    4,163ß

    quick w/out looking them up, what injuries did the Packers have to their starting line up! Go!!!!!
     

Share This Page