Whether It's Been Said Or Not Webb's On The Hot Seat...........

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by soulman, Aug 14, 2013.

  1. short faced bear

    short faced bear Assistant Head Coach
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,960
    Likes Received:
    1,404
    Ratings:
    +1,558 / 0 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    712ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    I just hope that after ALL this that the excuse "well we have nobody else" will never apply again esp. to a foundational position. We always were able to field "somebody else" at all the OL positions except for Webb.
     
    #161
  2. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    748
    Likes Received:
    420
    Ratings:
    +520 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    278ß
    The question would be if he was ready to play as a backup. He was starting regardless of his performance the past two years, and now the coaches have to ask themselves, "This guy wasn't ready to play as a starter. How far is he going to slide as a backup?"
     
    #162
    • Like Like x 1
  3. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    748
    Likes Received:
    420
    Ratings:
    +520 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    278ß
    Wait, 6 draft picks? Did I miss something? I thought we'd have 8 with the extra Carimi pick. What am I missing? I'm being serious, did we make another Brian Price move and lose another 7th?
     
    #163
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2013
  4. Mr. Deliverance

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    700
    Likes Received:
    109
    Ratings:
    +109 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    Holy shit what the hell is so difficult to understand about Webb being a valuable backup at this point and at his meager salary? What do backups do? They backup starters. You don't need an All pro serving as a backup. Does it even have to be brought up again how Webb graded out similarly to Bushrod last year? And the Bears threw millions at Bushrod.
     
    #164
  5. weneedmorelinemen

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Messages:
    748
    Likes Received:
    420
    Ratings:
    +520 / 0 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    278ß
    I read this idea repeatedly about PFF and their grading system. It's bullshit. In 2011, there was a LT on the Bills named Demetress Bell who graded out great on PFF. There was talk on the old CBMB that we needed to get this guy in 2012 as a cheap young alternative LT option. He signed with the Eagles last seasonfor a 5 year 34 million dollar contract after Jason Peters got hurt again.

    He was awful. He was one of the first guys to get cut in 2013.

    My point is PFF ranking does not mean anything. It's a nice rough estimate. If they rank somebody, like Webb's first time at LT where he scored like a -26, then yeah, they are probably on the mark. But when posters compare Webb to Bushrod because they had similar PFF grades, it just doesn't make sense.

    And if you don't need an All Pro as the backup, I'd take Scott over Webb. Scott at least will be ready to play. I think if you call Webb off the bench, he will not be game ready as a backup. He lacks the discipline.
     
    #165
    • Like Like x 3
  6. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,256
    Likes Received:
    3,407
    Ratings:
    +4,139 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,493ß
    Problem w/PFF they don't take into account how the plays are designed and what the responcibility of the OL is. For NO' the responcibility of the T was to drive the DE out and behind the qb so he can step into the pocket and drive the ball cleanly. Bushrod's job on 600+ attempts was to, by himself 80% of the time, force the DE outside and behind the QB, but b/c of that he got dinged constantly by PFF b/c of "pressures", but he did his job correctly. Webb's job was to stand his man up and keep him in front of him on approx 1/2 the same attempts as Bushrod, and he was only SLIGHTLY better w/his pressures and was WORSE in sacks.
    TL;DR
    So PFF's OL system is fundamentally flawed, and imo the only "pressure" that counts is when the QB has to change his standard throwing motion.
     
    #166
    • Like Like x 2
  7. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,279
    Likes Received:
    581
    Ratings:
    +670 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    460ß
    I would take Webb as the swing T over Scott. Scott played equally bad last year and can't stay healthy. Yes Webb has the maturity and work ethic of a toddler but I feel he is our best option and well pray it dosent come to him.
     
    #167
    • Like Like x 1
  8. riczaj01

    riczaj01 DaBears Ditka
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    23,256
    Likes Received:
    3,407
    Ratings:
    +4,139 / 10 / -8
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,493ß
    Grizz, that's how I see it, kinda like the backup qb position. Just have to pray Cutler stays healthy b/c McCown just not good.
     
    #168
    • Like Like x 1
  9. JustAnotherBearsFan99

    JustAnotherBearsFan99 Assistant Head Coach
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    11,547
    Likes Received:
    3,438
    Ratings:
    +4,095 / 4 / -1
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,497ß
    I hadn't thought about it that way, but it's a GREAT observation. I'm beginning to think Webb just isn't cut out for football at the professional level. It's like coaches thought in the past, that just because he has the physical attributes to play the game at a high level, that it was a "done deal" that he WOULD play the game at a high level.

    But this didn't account for his mental/emotional/maturity attributes. He seems like a genuinely nice guy who would be better off at a different job in life. Seriously. Maybe a job where he can just be a "gentle giant" who enjoys interacting with people. The issues that make him a poor starter, would probably make him a poor backup too.

    The "Webb Experiment" failed. Time to move on.


    [​IMG]
     
    #169
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2013
  10. Grizzblue

    Grizzblue Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,279
    Likes Received:
    581
    Ratings:
    +670 / 3 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    460ß
    I'm not saying we need him long
    Term. This year swing T. That's it in almost all scenarios. He is a better player than Scott who is old and can't stay healthy. IMO Scott should be cut and the question is really Webb vs Britton. Now if someone makes a case for Britton I would be more open to that idea than Scott.
     
    #170

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.