Wonder if Defense will be more 3-4 now w/out Bennett

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by BSBEARS, Mar 10, 2014.

  1. BSBEARS

    BSBEARS Pro-Bowler

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,840
    Likes Received:
    936
    Ratings:
    +1,258 / 4 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,047ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    Talking out loud here but Emery at combine stated they would primarily be a 4-3. Wonder if Plan B is a 3-4 look

    We have the coaches, still need to sign the players and most of the DE's out there are 3-4 DE. Several tweener DE's in the draft for 34 OLB. We all hashed through it before but not many pass rushers out there for a 4-3. Ravens and raiders 34de out there. Raji better as a 34dt than de, Ratliff comes from a 34 in Dallas. I no it seems far fetched but Emery also said they would play to the players they have and right now not seeing a 43 de except the vike Allen.

    Wish we got Bennett but looks like we would have overpaid, Briggs is the only player that may not fit a 34 who is signed. Unfortunately he is the best player on defense. Eager to see plan B but thinking we may be more 50-50 or more on alignment and thinking it may not be 4-3 as desired.
     
    #1

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.