Your Super Bowl 50 Logo

Discussion in 'Chicago Bears' started by The Benjamin, Jun 4, 2014.

  1. The Benjamin

    The Benjamin George Halas
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    48,002
    Likes Received:
    2,251
    Ratings:
    +2,673 / 7 / -9
    ßearz ßuckz:
    3,548ß
    Please Register or Log in to Remove this Advertisement!
    [​IMG]
     
    #1
  2. Jimmors

    Jimmors The Rhymenoceros
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    30,739
    Likes Received:
    4,636
    Ratings:
    +5,095 / 9 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,673ß
    Article about it:

    tl;dr - "Superbowl L" looked stupid (which it does), plus 50 is a big anniversary number, so they are opting to switch (ditch) the roman numerals for it, and simply refer to it as "Superbowl 50," but will return to the numerals the next year with SB LI. (i think they should just ditch the numerals all together, since "L" is pretty lame compared to "X," and just go with numbers from here on out.
     
    #2
    • Like Like x 2
  3. 4dabers

    4dabers Veteran
    DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    818
    Likes Received:
    708
    Ratings:
    +916 / 1 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    221ß
    I agree with that. Using roman numerals on things were big back in the 60's, 70's (watches, clocks, car names, etc.) when the Superbowl was in it early years, but they are not used nearly as much anymore. In fact, roman numerals are barely taught in school anymore. Obviously this is a miniscule topic, but I still agree none the less.

    I like the logo above and it would look exceptionally good adjacent to, or in coordination with, a Chicago Bears Logo.
     
    #3
    • Like Like x 2
  4. Jimmors

    Jimmors The Rhymenoceros
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2005
    Messages:
    30,739
    Likes Received:
    4,636
    Ratings:
    +5,095 / 9 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    1,673ß
    I have no problems with them using a system that isnt taught or learned, i thought the NFL was pretty unique in that regard.

    My issue is with how stupid they are going to look:

    LI, LII, LIII, LIV, LV, LVI, etc etc.

    XI, XII, XIX, XXIX, XVIII etc look cool, but the Ls? nah. And then once you get to the SB 100 (if the NFL lasts that long), you start the whole thing over again, but with C. SB C, CI, CII, CIII, etc. Dumb.
     
    #4
  5. Papa_Bear_7

    Papa_Bear_7 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    111
    Ratings:
    +146 / 0 / -0
    ßearz ßuckz:
    86ß
    They could say "Screw the Romans" and stick with X's. Super Bowl XXXXX.
     
    #5
    • Like Like x 2
  6. soulman

    soulman Pro-Bowler
    SuperFan DBS Writer

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    4,949
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Ratings:
    +1,917 / 7 / -3
    ßearz ßuckz:
    713ß

    There ya' go. The NFL is big enough and wealthy enough to create their own private use of Roman numerals. Frankly I don't care what they do about it. The number 50 looks fine but how about 51 or 52 or 57 or 73? So I'm with you. Just keeping using the Xs. Everybody remembers what value those have.
     
    #6
  7. little bear

    little bear Assistant Head Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    13,887
    Likes Received:
    1,397
    Ratings:
    +1,716 / 2 / -6
    ßearz ßuckz:
    2,694ß
    I don't care what kind of numbers they're using for the big game as long as the Bears are playing.
     
    #7
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

Copyright © DaBears.com. This site is a news, entertainment and information site covering the Chicago Bears and their fans.
DaBears.com is an independent fan site and not associated with the Chicago Bears, National Football League, or any other media site.
All content is provided by, and for, Bear fans. We invite your participation and suggestions.